Can we talk about Richard Banduric

Let’s discuss Richard Banduric.

A few weeks ago, episode 69 of the NASA and DOD-supported Ecosystemic Futures caught a lot of attention regarding the claims made by Richard Banduric. You can read the full transcript here.

In his appearance, Banduric casually shared his experiences with classified programs focused on reverse engineering technology that “wasn’t ours.” He mentioned cloaked Black Triangles and extraterrestrial materials that can “disintegrate” and “reconfigure,” among other astonishing claims.

Typically, I approach whistleblower testimonies with skepticism due to the potential for red flags or ulterior motives. However, Banduric is not a whistleblower. He isn’t connected to the UFO community and brought up these claims in a scientific context without prompting. He has experience working with DARPA and holds several patents related to propellant-less spacecraft propulsion systems. In his highly technical presentations (which have surprisingly only garnered 1.5k views over four years), he even displays images of the CARET craft. Remarkably, no one in the extensive Q&A session followed up on these images.

It’s perplexing and frustrating that, to my knowledge, no one seems to be truly attentive to Banduric’s insights. We often hear from recognizable figures like Sheehan and Strieber, but there’s a wealth of unexplored information here. I may not have the platform to promote this, but I’m hoping the usual voices in the community can step in. There’s untapped potential here. Jesse Michels, Coulthart, Dolan, UAPGerb—this is a call to engage with Banduric. He stated there’s information he can discuss, yet no one is asking the right questions.

One thought on “Can we talk about Richard Banduric

  1. It’s definitely interesting to see how Richard Banduric’s claims are being somewhat overlooked, especially given his background and the nature of the topics he discussed on Ecosystemic Futures. His experience with classified programs and DARPA lends him a certain credibility that many others lack. The fact that he brought up such extraordinary claims in a scientific context, rather than sensational media interviews, is also noteworthy.

    You raise a valid point about the lack of follow-up or interest from the UFO community and media figures. It’s puzzling that no one has taken the opportunity to dive deeper into his assertions about reverse engineering, cloaking technology, and extraterrestrial materials. It sounds like he touched on topics that could significantly expand our understanding of advanced technology and possibly reshape our perspective on the UFO phenomenon.

    Perhaps there’s a hesitance to engage with claims that are so radical or unconventional, but the scientific merit behind his career and the implications of his work are too significant to ignore. If he’s indicated that there are aspects he can discuss, it would certainly be worth it for some of the well-known researchers or influencers in the UFO community to reach out and explore this further.

    It’s frustrating to think that potential breakthroughs and vital insights are waiting in the wings while attention is focused elsewhere. Hopefully, as interest in UFOs and advanced technologies continues to grow, more people will take Banduric’s words seriously and invite him for deeper discussions. His insights could indeed serve as a crucial key to unlocking further understanding in this complex area.

Leave a Reply to ANPadmin Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *