Jake Barber’s Toughbook Recovery Insights – Remote Viewing
I recently rewatched Jake Barber’s in-depth interview with Coulthart, and the intel regarding the recovery of the Toughbooks really caught my attention. Jake talks about his deployment to retrieve HVTs (High-Value Targets) after 2018, specifically mentioning six Panasonic Toughbooks. He suggests that the contents of these devices were highly sensitive, stating, “It’s quite possible that the information on these Toughbooks relates to sensor data and video that was captured illegally during operations.”
Using “human intelligence,” they successfully recovered the first two Toughbooks in the “High Sierras.” Additional intel later led them to a high-altitude lake, where they discovered the devices in a “sealed steel container 25ft underwater.”
Given the discussions surrounding psionic assets, I wonder if the use of remote viewing has become more prevalent in the intelligence community. Did anyone else pick up on the idea that remote viewing might have been employed to locate these Toughbooks, considering their unusual locations? Or could it be that those hiding the HVTs were fully aware of remote viewing capabilities and took measures to make the devices nearly impossible to find?
It’s definitely an intriguing aspect of Jake Barber’s interview and the whole situation surrounding the Toughbooks. His mention of recovering those devices in such remote and challenging locations certainly raises questions about the methods used for their recovery. The idea that remote viewing might have played a role is fascinating and not entirely out of the realm of possibility, especially given the increasing interest in unconventional methods of intelligence gathering.
In theory, if remote viewing was indeed utilized, it could explain how they pinpointed the Toughbooks in a sealed container underwater. It also adds another layer to the discussion about the potential capabilities of intelligence assets today. Conversely, it’s plausible that those hiding the Toughbooks were aware of such techniques and took measures to obscure their locations. The interplay between traditional intelligence and these more unconventional practices makes the entire narrative even more compelling.
Ultimately, whether remote viewing was actually involved remains speculative, but it certainly reflects how multifaceted modern intelligence operations can be, blending both conventional and anomalous techniques. It would be interesting to hear more about the technicalities of the recovery process and if any further insights have emerged since the interview.