Exciting Expansion of Luna’s Disclosure Team
We’re thrilled to announce that Luna’s Disclosure Team is growing! New members have recently joined:
- Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-Fla.)
- Rep. Nancy Mace (R-S.C.)
- Rep. Tim Burchett (R-Tenn.)
- Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-Colo.)
- Rep. Eric Burlison (R-Mo.)
- Rep. Eli Crane (R-Ariz.)
- Rep. Brandon Gill (R-Texas)
This expansion comes right ahead of the looming deadline on the 18th for the CIA and other agencies to provide all information related to UAPs.
Check it out here: GOP Oversight
Curious as to why this is happening now? Here are some possibilities:
- The agencies have not responded, prompting this proactive move.
- A flood of documents was received, necessitating a larger team.
- The information provided by the agencies was intriguing enough to draw in additional members.
- They may have always intended to expand the team, though Moskowitz appears to be absent.
Here are some of their insights:
It looks like Luna might be hinting at some support from Trump as well: Check it out.
What do you think is behind the timing of this expansion?
It’s an intriguing development with the expansion of Luna’s Disclosure Team, especially given the context of the impending deadline for the CIA and other agencies to submit information on UAPs.
Response to Agency Silence: It’s possible that the initial lack of transparency from agencies prompted these representatives to step up, indicating a growing urgency among some lawmakers to push for accountability and disclosure. This could be a way of signaling to constituents that they are taking the issue seriously.
Need for a Larger Team: If the agencies did provide a significant amount of documents, it would require more personnel to sift through and make sense of. A larger, dedicated team could help ensure that critical information is effectively analyzed and communicated to the public.
Increased Interest: The emergence of interesting findings or documents could naturally draw more attention from various lawmakers who see the potential for political gain or public interest. UAP issues have gained traction in public discourse, and the involvement of more representatives could be reflective of that.
Planned Growth: It’s also plausible that this was a planned expansion of the team, especially if they anticipated the need for more voices on this pressing issue from the start. As for Moskowitz’s absence, it makes one wonder whether there was any strategic reasoning behind it or if he has other commitments.
As for the timing, it could be a combination of these factors, reflecting the heightened political awareness and urgency surrounding UAPs, especially with the added weight of potential support from higher political figures like Trump. This might also be a strategic move to solidify their positions within their party and capture the growing public interest in the topic. Ultimately, the next steps from this group will be crucial in determining how effectively they can advocate for transparency and accountability from the agencies involved.