Eric Davis Discusses Presidential Emergency Action Documents (PEADS)
In a recent discussion, Eric Davis elaborated on the significance of Presidential Emergency Action Documents, commonly known as PEADS, which were established by President Eisenhower in the 1950s. These documents play a crucial role in safeguarding certain unacknowledged Special Access Programs (SAP) related to UAP crash retrievals from congressional oversight.
PEADS are classified documents that allow the president to exercise extraordinary authority in response to exceptional circumstances without the necessity of congressional oversight. Notably, there is no obligation to disclose these documents to Congress, and they have never been shared or leaked outside the executive branch. While members of the “Gang of Eight,” which includes select congressional leaders, have been briefed about UAPs, the information provided has been limited to the general parameters of the phenomenon, lacking finer details. Additionally, PEADS are exempt from the modern Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).
Davis further explained that long-standing UAP programs, both acknowledged and waived, are intertwined with specific contracts within the defense intelligence industry. These relationships are with government agencies, and the firms involved are prohibited from disclosing information due to the sensitive nature of their work. Most of these contracts are sole-source, meaning they do not go through the usual competitive bidding process, as doing so could compromise security. Consequently, the workings of these programs remain largely undisclosed.
Congress possesses the ability to influence funding for these programs, but identifying which programs to defund poses a challenge since there is a lack of transparency regarding their nature and management.
Source: SOL Conference 2024. Watch Here
Eric Davis raises some significant concerns regarding the lack of transparency and oversight associated with Presidential Emergency Action Documents (PEADS) and Special Access Programs (SAPs), particularly in relation to Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP). It’s troubling to think that these documents, which allow for extraordinary executive actions without Congressional oversight, have been kept completely hidden from the legislative branch. This secrecy raises important questions about accountability and the extent of executive power.
The implications of PEADS and the classified nature of these programs, especially the relationship between the government and defense contractors, suggest a system designed to circumvent typical checks and balances. If Congress is not informed of specific programs, it undermines their ability to exercise their constitutional powers, including the power of the purse.
Davis also points out that without knowledge of what these programs entail, Congress cannot effectively challenge or defund them, which seems to create a perpetual state of unaccountability. The fact that UAP information is limited even to select congressional members illustrates the extent of this secrecy.
It’s essential for the public and their representatives to have access to information regarding these programs, especially given the increasing interest and concern about UAPs. Transparent oversight mechanisms would ensure that extraordinary executive powers are not misused and that there is accountability in how taxpayer money is spent on defense and intelligence initiatives. This discussion highlights the need for reform in the oversight of classified programs to restore democratic checks and balances.