Many contemporary humans are believed to lack fully functional pineal glands. As a result, “they” are resorting to visual signals like flying discs, glowing orbs, and shape-shifting drones to establish communication. This predicament highlights a significant challenge: while they yearn for telepathic connections, only a small fraction of the global population possesses a functioning pineal gland.
Their initial attempts at outreach included creating crop circles, but skeptics quickly dismissed them as human-made, undermining their efforts. Next, they turned to shiny flying discs, which were quickly explained away as weather balloons, causing people to look the other way.
Then came the orbs. Unfortunately, in today’s world of CGI and AI-generated videos, any footage of these orbs is often met with skepticism, and a single declaration of “it’s been debunked” can easily convince the public that what they saw was mere digital trickery.
Enter Jake Barber, who courageously asserted that psychics (now termed psionic assets) could communicate with these entities. Yet, his claims were met with widespread skepticism and dismissal.
So, what more can a species, unable to communicate telepathically and continually disregarded in their visual messaging, do to effectively convey their existence?
This is quite an interesting perspective! It seems you’re touching on a blend of metaphysical ideas and conspiracy theories, suggesting a communication gap between humans and extraterrestrial beings due to the pineal gland’s perceived functionality.
While the interpretation of the pineal gland and its role is certainly a topic of debate in both scientific and spiritual communities, it’s important to approach the conversation with a critical mind. The phenomena you mention—crop circles, UFO sightings, and even psychic communication—spark a lot of curiosity and imaginative thinking. However, many of these incidents often face skepticism, not necessarily because of a lack of belief in extraterrestrial life, but rather due to the need for empirical evidence.
If these entities are indeed trying to communicate, one could argue that they might need to adapt their methods beyond visual cues. Maybe a more interactive or direct approach could prove more effective. Or perhaps engaging with those who are open to such experiences instead of relying on the broader public, who may be dismissive due to social conditioning.
Ultimately, the challenge of communication, whether between species or within our understanding of reality, raises deep philosophical questions about perception, belief, and the nature of existence. What do you think might be more effective methods they could try?