Outrageous claims, deception, bizarre beliefs, and an endless stream of “coming soon” promises – this is the uncomfortable reality behind those lofty disclosure announcements. It’s striking how the individuals insisting that the government lacks transparency are often the same ones asserting they possess unique insights they cannot disclose. Whether it’s through the sale of their latest book, paid appearances at UFO conventions, ticketed documentaries, TV shows, paid courses, or donations to their for-profit organizations, they promise more information will soon emerge. In this post, I aim to examine the assertions made by these figures, their conduct, and their credibility, or lack thereof.
Ross Coulthart
Ross Coulthart faced expulsion from both Australian and British journalism after misreporting allegations against UK parliament members for involvement in horrific crimes, such as torture and child murder. His news outlet retracted his story and aired a full episode correcting his numerous errors, leading to the non-renewal of his contract. If he could get this wrong, what else is he misrepresenting about UFOs? Currently with NewsNation, a fringe station known for its unsubstantiated UFO reports, Coulthart claims to know the precise location of an immobile UFO so enormous that a building had to be constructed around it for concealment yet refuses to disclose its whereabouts. In the past, he has made extreme statements, suggesting that individuals concealing information about extraterrestrials should “be tarred and feathered and dragged around Washington, D.C.”
Watch Coulthart’s comments here.
Jake Barber
Jake Barber has been misrepresented as a “Tier One Operator” in a NewsNation interview, despite his DD-214 indicating otherwise; he was merely a flying crew chief who did not complete CCT training. Rather than acknowledging this, Barber claims his role was a cover for a secret team recovering crashed UFOs, with no evidence to back it. Furthermore, he asserts he was possessed by an angel during a mission and that certain groups of people can summon UFOs. His Skywatcher team released videos purporting to show UFOs in a dogfight, which analysis revealed to likely depict birds flapping their wings in the night sky.
Luis Elizondo
Luis Elizondo is a former U.S. Army Counterintelligence special agent and ex-employee of the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence. He claims to have directed the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP) focusing on UFOs, a claim the government challenges. Elizondo has been caught utilizing “sock puppet” accounts to harass critics, and in his recent book titled Imminent, he bizarrely details using remote viewing skills to scare a terrorist in his cell. He also controversially referred to himself as “The Czar of Torture” at Guantanamo Bay.
Elizondo has faced allegations of fabricating a UFO video on his property and has claimed sightings of orbs in his home without providing photographic evidence. He frequently hints at potential harm if he discloses what he knows, often citing nondisclosure agreements. His history includes promoting unfounded claims, being associated with dubious figures, and participating in the To The Stars Academy (TTSA) venture that failed to deliver on numerous promises.
See a video where he appears with key figures during a TTSA press conference.
During his book tour, Elizondo displayed a photo of an indoor chandelier, misrepresenting it as evidence of a significant UFO sighting. [
Your post raises important points about the credibility and motivations of certain individuals in the UFO community, and it’s evident that you’ve done extensive research to back up your claims. It certainly feels like there’s a tendency for sensationalism and opportunism among those involved in promoting UFO narratives.
The themes you discuss—misrepresentation, lack of evidence, and dubious associations—are often prevalent in the field of UFOlogy. It’s concerning when individuals with questionable pasts or loose interpretations of truth are positioned as credible sources of information. The claims of figures like Coulthart, Barber, Elizondo, and Grusch suggest more of a pattern than isolated incidents, reflecting what many would describe as a culture of sensationalism rather than one grounded in verifiable truth.
The cycle of “coming soon” revelations, coupled with the urging for financial support, certainly rings alarm bells for those invested in rigorous scrutiny. Skepticism is vital; without it, we run the risk of being misled by those who prioritize personal gain over transparency and truth. Your mention of Grusch’s background and the recent revelations about his mental health raises ethical questions about authenticity and exploitation in this narrative.
Moreover, it’s necessary to highlight how some claim to have insider knowledge while refusing to provide tangible evidence, leading to an environment where speculation can overshadow credible discourse. The “hearsay” nature of many of these claims further complicates the dialogue around UFOs—transforming potentially fascinating inquiries into grandstanding and misinformation.
It’s clear that critical examination is essential in navigating these discussions. Encouraging transparency and demanding evidence from those making extraordinary claims could help protect the integrity of the discourse. Your commitment to dissecting these narratives is commendable and crucial for fostering an informed dialogue around UFO phenomena. Thank you for sharing your perspective; it adds a valuable layer to the ongoing conversation about credibility and accountability in this field.