I believe that some individuals hold a higher standard for evidence before they accept something as true, and the more sensational claims tend to attract those who are easily swayed while leaving skeptics feeling alienated in their pursuit of actual proof.
I’m genuinely interested in the subject matter. It was Grusch’s revelations that sparked my curiosity, especially since my knowledge of ufology was mostly limited to a cursory understanding of the Roswell conspiracy. After watching the Joe Rogan episode featuring Fravor, my intrigue only deepened.
However, after nearly two years of following the developments in this field, it has become painfully clear, at least for me, that there is very little to genuinely get excited about.
While Grusch was an interesting figure, he provided no actual evidence. It seems he is simply recounting what a number of people with impressive titles—like Elizondo, who reportedly has orbs as pets and claims to have tested the limits of his mind—have told him.
This doesn’t hold much weight, even when given under oath. I could just as easily claim, “An esteemed intelligence official involved in a UAP program told me we possess alien spacecraft,” and if that individual was someone like Elizondo, I wouldn’t be lying.
Consequently, the Grusch revelations, while initially compelling, seem less credible upon deeper examination.
And beyond that? We essentially possess NOTHING that qualifies as evidence for alien visitation. I mean literally nothing.
Witness testimony? Sure, that’s valuable—especially from pilots and military personnel. But it falls short. There are countless testimonies, yet all we have in terms of tangible evidence are the FLIR, Gimbal, and Go Fast videos, which I personally find unconvincing.
Imagine if you weren’t already invested in this topic and were shown those videos. You wouldn’t immediately think, “Wow, this looks like evidence of intelligent alien life that has traveled light years to reach us.”
The only reason those videos are viewed as potential proof of UFOs is because of the preconceived notions brought into the viewing.
In my opinion, these videos are far from convincing.
So, what do we actually have? The reality is that we have little more than hearsay. In fact, there seems to be more evidence supporting the claims of the Abrahamic religions than there is for alien visitation. It’s worth noting that many highly credible individuals with impressive credentials genuinely believe in the Christian God, which should be considered when citing these figures.
In summary, we are left with essentially nothing. Now, they’re peddling vague, abstract concepts—claiming that the evidence is spiritual or rooted in personal experience, insisting that UFOs don’t need solid proof, just an open mind, and so forth.
This is a tactic to keep believers engaged because, quite frankly, they lack any concrete evidence to present.
You raise some valid points that echo a sentiment many share in the ongoing discussion around ufology. It’s true that skepticism is a crucial part of any investigation, especially in a field that has often been marred by sensationalism and lack of empirical evidence.
Your disillusionment with the claims surrounding figures like Grusch and Elizondo reflects a broader frustration with the lack of concrete evidence for extraterrestrial visitation. While eyewitness accounts can be compelling, they are not definitive proof. As you mentioned, the videos like FLIR, GIMBAL, and GOFAST may intrigue enthusiasts, but they often fail to meet the standard of evidence required to substantiate claims of alien technology or presence.
It’s understandable that the shift towards more abstract or spiritual interpretations in some discussions about UFOs can feel like a retreat from the pursuit of hard evidence. The idea that one should have an “open mind” can sometimes come across as an attempt to sidestep the very real need for tangible proof.
Overall, the combination of intriguing testimonies and the lack of verifiable evidence creates a challenging landscape for seekers of truth. It’s perfectly reasonable to require rigorous standards before accepting extraordinary claims, and continuing to question and seek clarity is an essential part of addressing the mysteries surrounding UAPs. Your skepticism could be a crucial driving force that encourages deeper investigation into the subject, rather than settling for speculation and hearsay.