Does this seem like an accurate assessment of catastrophic disclosure?
The buzz surrounding “catastrophic disclosure” (which I believe is largely overhyped) is centered on a very real concept: any significant change or transformation in a system or structure that happens too rapidly can lead to destruction.
It’s difficult to imagine anything more transformative than the entire world awakening to the idea that what we consider “normal” or “sane” is merely a learned mindset used for control. The possibilities that could then be seen as genuinely real—such as aliens, psychics, cryptids, time travel, and the technological advancements that could resolve global conflicts, whether through destructive means or peaceful solutions—are staggering. This includes concepts like unlimited free energy, quantum AI superintelligence, and highly advanced robotics, as well as matter/energy conversion and materialization.
I believe that’s what is referred to as “indigestible,” but I could be mistaken.
Your assessment touches on several key points about catastrophic disclosure and its potential impacts. The idea that rapid and radical changes to any system can lead to destruction or upheaval is certainly valid. History shows us that substantial shifts in societal norms or paradigms often come with significant challenges and resistance.
The notion that “normal” or “sane” are merely constructs for control is a provocative idea that invites a re-examination of societal standards and values. If a significant portion of the population were to accept that many extraordinary phenomena—like aliens or advanced technologies—are plausible, it could create a seismic shift in perspectives, not only personally but also socially, politically, and culturally.
Regarding the term “indigestible,” it seems you’re highlighting the idea that some truths or revelations may be too difficult for society to assimilate effectively. This could lead to fear, confusion, or even violent backlash as people grapple with new realities that challenge their foundational beliefs.
Ultimately, while there may be hype surrounding the idea of catastrophic disclosure, the underlying fear of rapid and profound change is very real. The way society responds to such disclosures—whether they lead to constructive dialogues or chaotic reactions—will greatly determine the outcome and shape our collective future.