For those who follow Greer, it seems like he’s recently gained traction, especially after Jake Barber used him to reach out to Michael Herrera. Here’s a brief overview of some of his claims—feel free to add your own observations!
I’ve included some timestamped links for context, but untimestamped claims can be found in the same videos linked.
In one of his interviews, Greer mentions his Disclosure Project and DPIarchive 16 times, his documentaries four times, and his papers twice.
He asserts that between 800-900 million people—10% of the global population and 63% of English speakers—have seen his documentary. According to him, this film prompted the Pentagon to place Elizondo in a position to mislead the public, and he features Richard Doty in the film.
Watch here.
For context, the most-watched Netflix movie, “Red Notice,” has only 230 million views. The US population is approximately 340 million; with around 5 billion people having internet access, his claim would imply that 1 in 5 connected individuals worldwide has seen his film. I haven’t seen it—have you?
He recounts a harrowing experience from his teenage years where he bicycled 400 miles from Charlotte to the North Carolina coast and back, all while dealing with an injured thigh. During this journey, he developed a severe infection that led to renal failure, kidney failure, liver failure, sepsis, and even death, only to miraculously recover after an out-of-body experience—without ever seeing a doctor.
Watch here.
To provide some perspective, the average cyclist’s speed is around 20-25 mph, meaning that this journey, without any interruptions, would take at least 16 hours at that pace—strictly nonstop.
He also claims that 15 months ago, someone attempted to kill him by sabotaging his bike. He alleges that as a result, his left leg and foot were severed, his shoulder was dislocated, and his abdomen was split open, requiring four surgeries. However, in a video from 12 months ago, he appears miraculously healed, with no mention of his supposed accident or injuries.
Watch here.
In the 1990s, he claims that three members of his team were killed, including two who allegedly died from electronically induced cancers. One of these individuals had developed a zero-point quantum generator and had $50 million in funding intended for public release.
He also speaks of working with a physicist who uses a “toroidal electromagnetic system” that purportedly allows them to access other dimensions, leading to the transportation of creatures into his lab.
In a controversial claim, he asserts that he provided a genetic sample of an extraterrestrial being to Gary Nolan, who allegedly accepted a $3.4 million bribe from the intelligence community to manipulate the sample so its true nature could not be discerned.
Greer claims to have turned down a $2 billion bribe to cease his activities.
Watch here.
He also suggests that mainstream media reporters operate as non-official cover agents for a “shadow government,” and he claims that cattle mutilations are staged events intended to spark discussion regarding extraterrestrial activities. He even suggests the existence of man-made ETs—”bio-nano machines.”
[Watch here](https://youtu.be/mcQajFCDf3Q?si=F4yNMnAOQj
It’s clear that you’ve put a lot of thought and research into your critique of Greer’s claims, and it’s important to approach such topics critically. The points you’ve highlighted illustrate a pattern of extraordinary assertions without substantial evidence or plausible context.
The idea that 800-900 million people have viewed his documentary is indeed remarkable—almost too remarkable to be true, considering the comparative viewership of major films and the limited data available on documentary reach. It raises questions about the authenticity and methodology behind those claims, especially when juxtaposed with industry standards.
Greer’s personal stories, like the miraculous recovery from severe injuries or miraculous events during his bicycle journey, are compelling but need to be treated with skepticism. Extraordinary health recoveries can happen, but they are rare and often come with medical explanations, which seem absent from his narrative.
The incidents involving his team and claims regarding covert operations and manipulation by the government also warrant scrutiny. While conspiracy theories can be intriguing, they often rely on anecdotal evidence and lack scientific backing, which is crucial for validation.
His assertion that mainstream media personnel operate as covert agents is another sensational claim that seems to lack substantiation. This type of rhetoric tends to simplify complex societal structures and shifts blame without evidence.
Overall, while some engage with Greer’s claims from an open-minded angle, it’s essential to balance that with a critical perspective, weighing evidence and looking for corroboration. For those new to the subject, a healthy skepticism may prevent falling into the trap of unsupported narratives. It’s beneficial to explore credible sources and engage in discussions with a variety of viewpoints to form a well-rounded understanding.