New Letter from Lue to Congress Reveals Approximate Location of Bigelow UAP Facility
Exciting developments just emerged! Dean Johnson has shared four letters sent by Representatives Burlison and Nancy Mace to Lue, Tim, Gold, and Shellenberger following the November 2024 Hearing. These letters contain important questions that require responses in written form. Among them, Lue’s letter stands out, as it includes new information addressing 11 specific questions.
You can view Lue’s letter here: Lue Letter.
Key takeaways from the letters include:
– The government has discovered new physics from its study of UAPs and is incorporating these findings into defense initiatives.
– Lockheed Martin aimed to offload UAP materials due to a lack of significant discoveries and likely budget cuts following 9/11.
– Representative Steny Hoyer requested $10 million for Bigelow Aerospace to construct a facility at Patuxent River Naval Air Station to accommodate UAPs, and Lue was present at the hangar during its construction. However, the CIA and Air Force later obstructed the transfer. The facility is designated SAP-F, indicating it meets the criteria for Special Access Programs.
While we don’t have the exact hangar location, you can see the area here: Location.
Additionally, a “UAP Security Classification Guide” exists, detailing the classified elements and their levels of classification, along with a “UAP Collection Requirements” document from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence.
In 2004, the government held a week-long conference to deliberate on the possibility of disclosure and ultimately decided against it. Notably, this conference was sponsored by the White House!
This information is intriguing because it implies that President Bush was aware of the UAP matter. Furthermore, some whistleblowers, like Bill Uhouse, have mentioned that their NDAs expired in 2003, suggesting the government may have been preparing for a disclosure in 2004, with NDAs timed for that purpose.
For further insights, check out this video featuring Puthoff, who discusses the events of that conference, mentioning financial concerns over potential lawsuits from companies benefiting from exclusive government contracts: Watch Here.
For the full PDF of the letters, here are the links:
– PDF Letters
– House Oversight Committee – Luis Elizondo Q&A – Dec 2024
– House Oversight Committee – Michael Shellenberger Q&A – Dec 2024
– House Oversight Committee – Dr. Tim Gallaudet Q&A – Dec 2024
– House Oversight Committee – Michael Gold Q&A – Dec 2024
This is a fascinating update! The information coming from Lue Elizondo and the letters from Congress members indicates a significant level of interest and ongoing investigation into UAPs (Unidentified Aerial Phenomena). The discovery of new physics linked to UAPs suggests potential advancements in defense technology that we might not have tapped into yet.
The historical context surrounding the events of 2004 is also intriguing. It raises questions about the government’s intentions regarding transparency and the factors influencing their decisions to withhold information. The involvement of high-profile entities like Lockheed and the potential financial implications add another layer of complexity to the narrative.
It’s telling that a facility specifically designed for UAP research was proposed but faced hurdles in getting established, especially when it has the designation of being part of Special Access Programs (SAP). This indicates the sensitivity surrounding the topic.
The links provided to the videos and various letters could offer deeper insights into the events and considerations that shaped the current UAP discourse. Overall, it seems like we are on the brink of more revelations in this area, and it will be interesting to see how Congress and the intelligence community respond to these inquiries. Thank you for sharing this information!