As a former skeptic this is what’s keeping me from talking to and showing uniformed people about the issue of UAPs.

As a former skeptic, I’ve found that the prevalence of misinformation is a major barrier for me when it comes to discussing Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAPs) with uninformed individuals. I used to disregard UFOs entirely, believing them to be entirely fictional, influenced by wild stories of abduction and body recovery. That perspective changed during a flight when I witnessed something extraordinary.

While trying to immerse myself in Finnish by peering out the window, I spotted a silver sphere that reflected sunlight eerily, much like being blinded by the sun gleaming off a metal surface. My first thought was whether a plane could collide with a weather balloon or some runaway gender-reveal balloon. Then, the object abruptly halted its ascent, veered left, and executed a rapid 90-degree turn upward without losing speed. The movement was so bizarre that I struggle to even describe it—a bit like explaining the color red to someone who can’t see.

It then slowed down dramatically and simply vanished. Upon researching, I discovered it resembled the infamous Mosul orb. I didn’t bring it up with my fellow passengers because, frankly, we tend to tease each other mercilessly, and I didn’t want to be the target of a week’s worth of jokes. It was only after reading various Australian government documents that I understood how typical it was for authorities to dismiss such experiences as insane or fabricate explanations.

When I stumbled upon this subreddit, I was genuinely intrigued; many videos were rigorously analyzed, and UAPs were often attributed to mundane sources like insects or birds. However, the space is now cluttered with posts from individuals claiming to summon UFOs with their mind and offering guidance—if you purchase their $20 book, of course.

I would love to share genuine findings about UAPs with friends and family, but it’s frustrating that every credible post gets overshadowed by sensational claims, like those of a “former special forces operative” who allegedly needs just a little time to summon a UAP. It’s troubling that there is substantial evidence that could potentially sway 95% of the population about the seriousness of this issue, yet it gets buried beneath a mountain of scams and ridiculous narratives.

In short, the overwhelming presence of charlatans makes it difficult to engage in authentic discussions. Many of us who want to talk about UAPs find ourselves hesitant to do so for fear of sounding insane amid the surrounding absurdity.

One thought on “As a former skeptic this is what’s keeping me from talking to and showing uniformed people about the issue of UAPs.

  1. I completely understand where you’re coming from. It’s really frustrating to have a genuine experience that challenges your prior beliefs, only to find that the discourse around it is filled with misinformation and sensationalism. Your sighting sounds intriguing and is reminiscent of many credible encounters that have been reported over the years.

    It’s unfortunate that the legitimate evidence and discussions are often overshadowed by those who seek to profit from the phenomenon or promote dubious claims. It can make it hard to engage in meaningful conversations about UAPs without being dismissed or having your thoughts clouded by the noise created by grifters.

    Finding a way to frame your experiences and the credible evidence in a way that resonates with friends and family could be key. Maybe starting with the government’s recent acknowledgment of UAPs and the ongoing investigations could provide a more grounded entry point. It’s also helpful to focus on the scientific aspects and documented incidents rather than the more fringe claims—gradually building a case for discussion grounded in objective analysis rather than sensationalism.

    You’re right: there’s a lot of credible information out there, and it’s a shame it’s buried under so much noise. Sharing your own experience, along with solid research, can help create a more open-minded dialogue. Don’t lose hope; it sounds like you’re already thinking critically about these issues, and that’s a great start!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *