The true early history of the Phenomenon and the Pentagon needs to be better known or we will end repeating the past.

Understanding the Early History of UFO Phenomena and the Pentagon: Lessons from the Past

As a seasoned archaeologist and historian with four decades of research into unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP) and related mysteries, I have come to view this subject through a broad historical lens. Recent developments in UAP disclosures and public discourse highlight the importance of understanding the true origins and early history of this phenomenon. Without this context, we risk repeating previous mistakes and obscuring the broader narrative.

Recent Weeks Reveal Gaps in Public Knowledge

Over the past few weeks, it has become apparent that there is a significant gap in awareness among many enthusiasts and observers regarding the roots of the modern UFO phenomenon, particularly from the late 1940s and early 1950s. For instance, I shared a copy of the 1947 letter from General Harold Twining, which bears striking similarity to the Pentagon’s recent reports on UAPs. The reactions ranged from surprise to ignorance, indicating that many are unfamiliar with the foundational documents that shaped official and public understanding.

Similarly, the 1947 Kenneth Arnold sighting—often cited as the event that launched the modern UFO era—remains relatively obscure to some, despite its pivotal role. Recently, a documentary revisited Arnold’s encounter, but many viewers expressed astonishment at its significance, suggesting that critical historical context is not common knowledge.

Moreover, the declassified 1971 Australian Summary Reports, which offer a concise history of UAP investigations, often only reiterate earlier accounts such as Edward Ruppelt’s 1956 summary from Project Blue Book. While there is some new material, much of this document echoes past reports, underscoring how foundational information continues to shape current narratives.

The Pentagon’s Resistance and the Role of Historical Awareness

There are elements within the Pentagon, particularly within the U.S. Air Force, that remain resistant to full disclosure. These factions appear to exploit the general lack of historical understanding among the public and even some investigators, attempting to obscure lessons learned and previous trajectories of official engagement.

Figures like Lue Elizondo and Chris Mellon have sought to bring transparency to UAP issues, only to face suppression and opposition. The tactics employed are reminiscent of earlier attempts at gatekeeping and information control, compounded by challenges posed by the internet and digital communication. Yet, understanding past strategies is vital in anticipating current and future efforts to manage or hinder disclosure.

Moving Forward: Education Through Historical Context

Given these observations, I am considering developing a series—