Too many people are fixated on what didn’t happen and are refusing to acknowledge what did.

The Fallacy of Fixation: Recognizing Significance Beyond the Obvious

In recent discussions surrounding unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP), a recurring trend has emerged: a fixation on what has not been observed or presented, rather than on what has been substantiated. Specifically, some critics dismiss or downplay credible testimony when it fails to include dramatic, Hollywood-esque revelations—such as alleged extraterrestrial corpses or clear alien artifacts—focusing instead on superficial standards that may be unjustified or counterproductive.

Challenging Unreasonable Expectations

Much of the public discourse seems centered on a simplistic benchmark: unless witnesses produce a dead alien specimen alongside wreckage from an extraterrestrial craft, the entire matter is deemed insignificant. But why is this the standard? Who has set this threshold? When we discuss unexplained aerial objects, is it realistic or rational to demand literal remains of extraterrestrial beings as evidence of their existence?

To put this into perspective, consider how groundbreaking technological advances are typically recognized. When the SR-71 Blackbird was first introduced, what kind of evidence was available? Grainy photos and unconfirmed sightings. No clear “dead alien” to showcase; yet, the aircraft was widely acknowledged as a remarkable feat of engineering, instantly changing the landscape of reconnaissance technology. If we held the same absurd standards for these advanced aircraft, we would have dismissed the entire program pending the discovery of extraterrestrial remains—that’s an unreasonable benchmark.

The Power of Firsthand Testimony and Physical Evidence

Beyond sensationalism, we have credible testimonies from aviation experts like David Fravor, and military officials such as Graves and Gaetz, who have shared firsthand accounts of objects that defy our current understanding of physics. These reports describe craft exhibiting propulsion and material properties that surpass known human capabilities. This information alone should be of profound interest, regardless of whether “alien bodies” are involved.

These claims suggest technological advancements—regardless of origin—that could have major implications for national security, commercial aviation, and scientific understanding. Whether this technology is sourced from space, terrestrial adversaries, clandestine research, or other unknown origins, it warrants attention. Dismissing it because the evidence doesn’t match a Hollywood-standard narrative ignores the real significance of these technological anomalies.

Addressing the ‘Old News’ Argument

Some argue that discussions about UAP have been ongoing for years, implying that new claims hold little value. To illustrate this, consider a neighbor warning about wasps nesting at