Ross Coulthart: AARO doesn’t have a Phone Number, it doesn’t have an Email address. I’m currently advising 1st hand witnesses to contact the Congressional Committees involved, the DOD IG or the ICIG.

Transparency Concerns Surrounding AARO: Lack of Contact Information and Relevant Oversight Channels

In recent disclosures, investigative journalist Ross Coulthart has highlighted significant transparency issues pertaining to the Department of Defense’s All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO). During a segment with NewsNation, Coulthart revealed that AARO does not provide a publicly accessible phone number or email address for contact, prompting concern among witnesses and interested parties seeking to communicate with the agency.

First-Hand Witnesses Facing Communication Barriers

Coulthart shared that individuals with direct knowledge or experience related to unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP) are reaching out to him for guidance on how to engage with AARO. However, the absence of straightforward communication channels has caused frustration and confusion. Recognizing this, Coulthart has advised these witnesses to instead contact congressional oversight committees, the Department of Defense Inspector General (DOD IG), or the Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG) — official entities responsible for oversight and accountability in defense matters.

Implications of the Lack of Contact Infrastructure

The fact that AARO does not maintain a direct contact line raises questions about transparency and accessibility, especially given the sensitive nature of the information it handles. Meanwhile, the agency appears to allocate substantial funds to external contractors, such as SANCORP, which was awarded a $1.9 million contract by the Department of Defense. SANCORP specializes in security measures related to leak prevention, insider threat mitigation, and whistleblower management.

Concerns About Confidentiality and Whistleblower Handling

The substantial expenditure on a firm linked to leak prevention and whistleblower suppression fuels speculation about the agency’s approach to managing sensitive information. Critics argue that such spending, combined with limited access points, may stifle transparency and hinder legitimate reporting from insiders. These concerns are reinforced by reports emphasizing that AARO’s operational parameters and communication protocols are not openly accessible to the public or to potential witnesses.

Conclusion: The Need for Transparent Communication Channels

The current state of affairs underscores a pressing need for AARO to establish clear, accessible contact avenues for witnesses, researchers, and the public. Transparency is vital for trust, accountability, and effective oversight, particularly when dealing with phenomena of significant national and scientific interest. As the conversation around UAPs and government transparency continues to evolve, stakeholders advocate for open lines of communication that respect both national security and the rights of whistleblowers and witnesses.

Further Reading and References

• Witnesses seeking contact