Rep Ogles from Tennessee just threatened the DoD and intelligence community. Why is this being glossed over by everyone?

Rep. Ogles of Tennessee Issues Bold Threat to the DoD and Intelligence Community During Congressional Hearing

In a recent congressional hearing, Representative Ogles from Tennessee made headlines with a statement that has raised eyebrows across political and intelligence circles alike. During the session, Rep. Ogles requested a Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility (SCIF) hearing to interview three witnesses regarding classified information that could not be disclosed publicly. His demand for access was met with firm opposition, prompting him to declare an unconventional course of action.

According to Rep. Ogles, if his request for a SCIF hearing is denied — thereby preventing Congress from examining certain classified materials — he is prepared to invoke the Holman Rule. This rule, historically used to reduce the pay or size of specific federal agencies or programs, could be wielded as a tool to challenge the obstruction and possibly remove officials or agencies blocking access.

A Bold Stance Against Classification Barriers

The moment in question occurs at approximately 20 hours into the hearing, and can be viewed here [Link to the timestamp]. In that segment, Rep. Ogles explicitly states that he plans to “enact the Holman Rule” if denied the opportunity to question witnesses behind classified information barriers. His words imply a willingness to confront what he perceives as executive or bureaucratic overreach, especially concerning sensitive topics like UFOs and UAPs that have gained increasing public and congressional interest.

Implications and Context

This declaration signifies a potentially aggressive stance toward the security classification system, especially when transparency is at the forefront. The fact that a sitting member of Congress is willing to threaten such measures — including targeting the Department of Defense and intelligence agencies — underscores a broader tension surrounding classified information and accountability.

This particular incident is noteworthy because it highlights the growing willingness among some lawmakers to confront and challenge the secrecy that often surrounds national security and intelligence matters, especially in the emerging domain of unidentified aerial phenomena.

Public and Expert Reactions

While some analysts view Rep. Ogles’ comments as a bold defense of congressional oversight, others see it as a provocative move that could escalate tensions with intelligence agencies. The preparedness to “enact the Holman Rule” as leverage to gain access to classified information reflects a changing dynamic in how oversight and transparency may be enforced in the future.

Final Thoughts

This development stands out as one of the most direct challenges to the traditional boundaries of classified information in recent congressional history. If Rep. Ogles pursues these threats, it