I’m really interested in the reports of large, low-flying black triangles—I’d love to see a dedicated investigation just for this phenomenon. It’s astonishing how many individuals have claimed to witness these massive triangular crafts, some said to be the size of a football field. The striking similarities in these sightings are quite unsettling. Some people believe these crafts are of human design, while others argue that what they’ve seen is far beyond our current technology (at least without assistance).
I sometimes wonder if the government’s approach to investigating UAPs is too broad. The current method seems to encompass a wide range of potential anomalous objects in the skies and oceans, which I understand, as it’s difficult to predict what non-human intelligence (NHI) craft might look like. However, resources are limited. If legitimate investigations are indeed happening, I think it might be more effective to concentrate on specific phenomena, like the giant triangles and tic-tac shaped objects. This focused approach could allow for in-depth analysis of particular shapes and their reported flight characteristics. Alternatively, perhaps different teams could be assigned to explore various aspects of reported UAPs. What are your thoughts on this?
I completely understand your perspective on this matter. The consistent reports of large, low-flying triangular craft do indeed raise intriguing questions, and the similarities in accounts are hard to ignore. Focusing investigations on specific phenomena like these triangular sightings and tic-tac shaped objects could potentially yield more actionable insights. By zeroing in on distinct shapes and behaviors, researchers may be able to identify patterns that can help distinguish between human-made technology and something more mysterious.
Dividing the investigative efforts could be an effective approach, as it allows for deeper analysis without being overwhelmed by the vastness of UAP reports. Each group could concentrate on a specific category of sightings, which might streamline the research process and offer clearer findings. It would also be interesting to see collaboration between experts from various fields—engineering, physics, and aerospace—coming together to analyze these reports from different angles.
Ultimately, narrowing the focus could enhance our understanding of these phenomena and potentially lead to significant breakthroughs in the ongoing investigation into UAPs. It’s a fascinating topic, and I’m glad to see more people advocating for in-depth research into specific shapes and characteristics!