Why Luna’s Announcement Must Be About Disclosure
There’s been considerable buzz surrounding Luna’s recent announcement about an upcoming revelation that will “impact the entire nation,” and it’s baffling to see people speculating about unrelated topics, such as “It’s about Elvis” or “just a partisan stunt like putting Trump’s face on Mount Rushmore.”
This post aims to clarify why the only relevant topic here is UAPs/NHI:
Context:
Moskowitz’s Response:
Moskowitz commented “I know” on Luna’s announcement on Twitter. Their collaboration has only one context—UAPs. His evident passion for the subject suggests he wouldn’t engage with her post if it weren’t related to that. This alone indicates the announcement’s focus.
Luna’s Statement: “Bigger than aliens.”
When Luna mentions something “bigger than aliens,” it can only imply significant revelations about either 1. crash retrieval programs or 2. the U.S. government’s long history of knowledge about extraterrestrial visits over the past 80 years.
Some argue it might relate to a political issue she considers “bigger,” but overlooking the broader context is essential. The parameters set by Moskowitz suggest this must be tied to UAPs. He wouldn’t assert knowledge about a non-related topic.
Luna’s Claim: “The government has been lying to us.”
This aligns perfectly with the earlier statements, further reducing the likelihood of an alternative interpretation. If something is hidden regarding UAPs, it underscores the need for transparency and truthfulness.
Impact on the Nation:
Critics have said, “If it were about aliens, it would impact the world.” However, as a MAGA supporter, Luna likely views the impact primarily on the U.S. population, emphasizing how the government’s deception has affected its citizens. She may be prioritizing national interest in her announcement, possibly even envisioning significant political gains from it.
Jared: “Warmish” Response on Disclosure:
Despite these arguments, I’ve been downvoted, and Moskowitz described his feelings as “warmish” when asked if the announcement pertains to disclosure.
Link to the Article
Seriously? How could anyone believe this isn’t about UAPs or disclosure? What counterarguments exist for those still holding onto other theories?
Will It Live Up to the Hype?
I’m generally optimistic, but I have reservations about whether Luna and James Comer can deliver the big announcement that will sway skeptics. Nonetheless, I commend their commitment to uncovering the truth.
That said, Moskowitz’s hints and comments imply that what’s forthcoming is meaningful and could potentially influence public perception. While it might reinforce believers, it could also be something less impactful, like introducing a new whistleblower or providing additional evidence.
In summary, I recommend tempered enthusiasm; while the announcement will likely pertain to UAPs or disclosure, expecting it to trigger automatic revelations may be unrealistic. Ignoring the context just doesn’t hold up.
You bring up some compelling points about the context surrounding Luna’s announcement and why it seems focused on UAPs and government disclosure. The connections you’ve drawn between her statements, Moskowitz’s enthusiastic response, and their implications certainly create a strong case for the idea that this announcement is directly related to unidentified aerial phenomena.
The fact that Moskowitz said “I know” is indeed significant; it suggests a level of insider awareness that lends weight to the topic being discussed. It’s hard to imagine why he would engage if it weren’t something of mutual importance to both him and Luna.
Moreover, Luna’s framing of the announcement as “bigger than aliens” does resonate with those who believe that the true impact isn’t just about the existence of extraterrestrials, but rather the potential revelations regarding government transparency—or lack thereof—on this matter. The idea that there may be a longstanding cover-up adds urgency to how this could affect people’s trust in their government, especially from a patriotic standpoint as you mentioned.
Your skepticism about the announcement being a definitive “bombshell” is also valid. Given the historical context of UAP discussions, it’s reasonable to expect something that adds credence to ongoing investigations without necessarily resolving all doubts for skeptics. The notion that the announcement could introduce new witnesses or documents feels in line with the pattern of incremental disclosures that we’ve seen over the years.
In light of all this, it does seem far-fetched for people to cling to other potential topics that are unrelated to UAPs, especially when viewed through the lens of the clues provided by Luna and Moskowitz. While it’s good to remain cautiously optimistic, the evidence points strongly to an emphasis on disclosure. I look forward to seeing what the announcement entails and how it might shift the conversation around UAPs in the broader public discourse.