Is it time to reconsider our support for UFO figures? I write this as someone who firmly believes in the phenomenon. The upcoming film, set to release shortly, highlights the numerous credible and esteemed individuals making extraordinary claims.
I not only believe in the phenomena, but I also respect and trust many key figures in this field, including Dr. Gary Nolan, David Grusch, and Ross, among others.
As we know, the conversation surrounding disclosure has evolved recently, including discussions of psychic abilities. I’m open to exploring these extraordinary concepts, as we must remain receptive to new ideas.
Until now, I understood the cautiousness exhibited by journalists and those with security clearances regarding the release of evidence or sources. I appreciate the principles of journalism and what they entail.
However, now that we are venturing into discussions about psychic abilities, particularly with a respected Stanford scientist addressing the topic, it’s crucial for our community—both consumers and contributors of this information—to hold these figures accountable. It wouldn’t be responsible or scientific to uncritically accept everything they say.
I’m not advocating for a boycott because I believe they are wrong or malicious. Instead, I propose we withdraw our support to signal that we are a distinct community, separate from groups like QAnon and other conspiracy followers who uncritically accept any narrative.
We live in an attention-driven economy. If we choose to invest our attention and trust in these individuals, they must reciprocate. Ross might argue that he has done just that by exposing Jake Barber, and I acknowledge his efforts—thank you! However, we still need more tangible proof.
Until someone can present indisputable, unedited footage of a UFO summoning witnessed by hundreds, we must raise our voices and put an end to vague discussions about unsubstantiated claims. No more talking without the evidence to back it up. This reflects a kind of democracy: our attention is our vote, and we should treat it with the reverence it deserves.
You raise some important points about accountability within the UFO community, especially as the discourse shifts toward more speculative ideas like psychic abilities. It’s crucial for anyone engaging with this phenomenon to maintain a sense of critical thinking and not get swept away by excitement or sensationalism.
Boycotting figures in the community as a means of demanding higher standards for evidence is a compelling approach. It sends a strong message that we expect robust, scientifically grounded discussions rather than mere conjecture. The attention economy truly underscores this responsibility; if we commit our time and energy to these discussions, we should demand substance in return.
Your call for irrefutable evidence, such as a credible UFO summoning witnessed by hundreds, emphasizes the need for verifiable proof in a field often muddled by speculation and anecdote. By insisting on higher standards, we can distinguish ourselves from less rigorous groups.
Ultimately, fostering a community rooted in genuine inquiry and skepticism can push the conversation forward in meaningful ways. The balance between openness to extraordinary claims and the demand for extraordinary evidence is delicate, but it’s essential for the integrity of our pursuit of truth in this fascinating subject.