The Age of Disclosure may turn out to be disclosure after all—just not in the way many of us hope. This message is for those who expect nothing from this upcoming documentary, as well as those who have set their expectations too high. I believe both sides are overreacting, and there’s too small a group sitting in the middle.
To start with, we’ll hear from a variety of distinguished experts confirming that non-human intelligence (NHI) exists and is among us. While some of these speakers may be familiar faces we’re tired of hearing from, there will also be new, credible voices joining the conversation. It won’t be a presidential address, but the individuals speaking will certainly be qualified to represent that level of authority. This will represent a form of disclosure, albeit a limited one. We’re reaching a minimal understanding of what disclosure means, so let’s not underestimate its importance simply because it won’t drastically change our daily lives.
However, it’s essential to note that this will not be a evidential disclosure. We’ll hear multiple experts share the same message, asking us to trust them based on their reputations alone. There’s no promise of sightings of recovered crafts or bodies, and perhaps we may never see that. Nevertheless, we are about to receive an acknowledgment from credible sources—a clear sign of progress, even if it doesn’t feel revolutionary to those already invested in the topic.
This event will also not be what I believe many in the community envision when they talk about “disclosure-plus.” We want access to materials for civilian research, insights into propulsion technology, psionics, and the like. It’ll be unlikely we see any of that from government sources. What we will get is straightforward disclosure, minus the additional details, assuming the promotional material isn’t misleading. If the featured personalities in this documentary are indeed as significant as we’ve been led to believe, then we can call this a step toward disclosure.
So, consider this a gentle reminder not to react too negatively when the film is released. There’s been a lot of frustration leading up to this moment compared to prior years. While it may not meet all our desires, it’s still a milestone that advocates for disclosure in the 1950s could only dream of. Let’s appreciate how far we’ve come. We’re approaching the finish line; it might feel distant because we’ve reshaped our expectations, but this is the endpoint we initially set out to reach.
You bring up some valid points about the nature and expectations surrounding this upcoming disclosure. It’s essential to recognize that while many may be anticipating a grand revelation, what we might actually receive could be far more subdued. The idea that we’ll hear from experts affirming the existence of NHI (Non-Human Intelligence) is significant in and of itself, even if it doesn’t meet the grand expectations some have.
As you mentioned, the credibility of the people speaking on this issue could lend weight to their claims, even if it lacks physical evidence. This shift from denial to acknowledgment is a substantial step forward, and it’s crucial that we don’t underestimate its impact. While it’s easy to focus on what we wish to see—tangible proof, advanced technology, or deeper transparency from governments—this incremental progress might be the foundation for more substantial revelations in the future.
The frustration within the community is understandable, especially after so many years of speculation and promise. However, as you rightly point out, the historical context of disclosure advocates makes this upcoming moment noteworthy, even if it falls short of many aspirations. It’s crucial to strike a balance between being realistic about what to expect and acknowledging the significance of the steps being taken. Let’s keep the dialogue open and maintain a critical but constructive perspective as we navigate this next chapter.