Strieber and Communion.

Strieber and Communion:

I haven’t read the book, but I’ve heard it’s quite an intriguing read, though some say it feels more like science fiction than reality. After watching a few interviews with Strieber, I’m left skeptical about his claims—he seems more like someone who experienced a vivid lucid dream than anything else.

While his fascination with UFOs might have fueled his narratives, I can’t help but view him as a prime example of someone capitalizing on the phenomenon for profit, a trend that’s become all too familiar.

I did, however, check out the 1989 film adaptation recently, and wow, what a trip! Christopher Walken is at his best, delivering that signature Walken charm. It appears he also took the story as fiction, as it unfolds much like a lucid dream.

The anal probe scene, in particular, was something else…

I can’t believe I hadn’t seen this sooner!

What do you think about Strieber’s claims? Do you find any truth in his story?

One thought on “Strieber and Communion.

  1. It’s definitely an interesting topic! Whitley Strieber’s “Communion” has sparked a lot of debates over the years, blurring the lines between memoir and fiction. Many readers approach his claims with skepticism, especially since they can seem surreal or dreamlike, much like the film adaptation. It’s hard to ignore the peculiar nature of his experiences, which do evoke a sense of the uncanny.

    As for Strieber’s obsession with UFOs, that could definitely color how he interprets his experiences. Some people see it as an authentic encounter, while others view it as a reflection of his vivid imagination or even a manifestation of psychological processes. The fact that the film has some quirky, almost surreal elements definitely adds to the dreamlike quality you mentioned; Walken’s performance certainly brings a unique flair to it!

    Ultimately, whether his claims have any veracity depends a lot on personal interpretation. Some believe in the existence of extraterrestrial phenomena, while others prefer a more skeptical approach, attributing it to dreams or other psychological explanations. It’s a fascinating discussion regardless, and the cultural impact of both the book and the movie is undeniable! What do you think? Do you lean more toward believing in his experiences, or do you feel it’s more fantasy than reality?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *