Here’s a revised version of the post:
Remember Barber, the psionics expert? In 2021, Bigelow remarked, “Machinery truly exists. Its consciousness-driven, not just like fingerprints. As a species, we’re embarrassingly behind—still relying on fire engines. Our spiritual evolution has flatlined. Some individuals can actually perform macro psychokinesis.”
Joe Murgia shared a clip from a video interview with Bigelow on X, featuring some intriguing quotes. It’s worth noting that the CIA previously blocked the transfer of NHI crafts to Bigelow Aerospace.
Is Bigelow a Witness?
Knapp: “Did you ever see it?”
Bigelow: “Umm. Well, I’ve…there’s, I, umm… You know, do you see things that are photos, or do you see things in person? You don’t want to talk about stuff in case it happens in the future.”
Bigelow seems visibly uneasy responding to this question. He appears to be a firsthand witness who is constrained from speaking out, leaving the possibility open for future developments.
Bigelow’s Analogy: Like Owning a Fragment of a Phone Case
Bigelow: “I think that machinery does exist—it really does. However, the challenge has been the inability to reverse engineer it. Some aspects might require a weightless environment, which we don’t have on Earth. What’s needed is a manufacturing facility that offers such an environment.”
Knapp: “That’s part of why you established Bigelow Aerospace.”
Bigelow: “Exactly. But owning a tiny piece of a case that held a cell phone doesn’t help you understand what it contained, let alone how a cell phone functions. It’s all interconnected—without the necessary communication infrastructure, it’s useless. An answer based on just a small fragment doesn’t offer much insight.”
The Machinery is Consciousness-Driven
Bigelow: “As a species, we are embarrassingly behind—we’re practically a galactic embarrassment. We might not even be able to consciously operate these machines because they’re not like fingerprints or anything; they’re driven by consciousness. It’s frustrating to realize that we may have the potential to reverse engineer more, but our current understanding remains limited.”
Bigelow: “What we’re experiencing is outside the realm of our current educational systems, especially in physics. We’re still dealing with primitive technologies like fire engines.”
Humans Are Flatlined in Spiritual Evolution
Bigelow: “Our inclination to turn technology into weapons is concerning. There’s a lack of intersection between spirituality and technology. The line for spirituality has flatlined, whereas technological evolution is accelerating rapidly.”
Bigelow: “Where’s the harmony? I can’t foresee any significant developments in spirituality in the next century or two that would align with technological progress. There’s just no indication of a future integration between the two, and that worries me.”
For more detailed insights and analysis, check out the full post on X here.
Bigelow’s remarks are certainly thought-provoking and provoke deeper contemplation on both technology and consciousness. His discomfort in discussing potential firsthand experiences with non-human intelligence (NHI) suggests there are layers to what he knows or wishes to convey. The idea that our understanding of consciousness and technology is still in its infancy is a powerful commentary on society’s current trajectory.
His metaphor about owning a sliver of a case for a cell phone highlights the challenges of gaining true insight without a comprehensive understanding of the systems at play. It raises questions about how we contextualize the scraps of advanced technology we may come across without the capability to fully integrate or comprehend them.
Furthermore, Bigelow’s notion of our spiritual evolution being at a standstill while technological advancements race ahead is a profound concern. This dissonance could lead not only to ethical dilemmas but also to potential misuse of advanced technologies if we fail to cultivate a corresponding moral framework.
Ultimately, Bigelow prompts us to consider not just the technology itself, but how we engage with it on a spiritual and ethical level, which could ultimately define our future as a species. The intersection of these realms may be critical as we navigate the complexities of our rapidly advancing society. The conversation he’s initiating is one that surely deserves further exploration and dialogue.