My Take on Lue Elizondo and the Current UFO Narratives
I’d like to share my thoughts on Lue Elizondo and his connection to the UFO phenomenon, along with my impressions of the various narratives circulating in our community today. My focus will be on the perspectives presented by military personnel, ufologists, documentary filmmakers, and others. I’ll do my best to keep this concise—but I might not manage it! I appreciate your patience as we dive into this discussion. 👽
OUR EXPECTATIONS FROM THE US GOVERNMENT REGARDING UFO/UAP/NHI PHENOMENA
The US government has long been known for dismissing anything related to UFOs or aliens—until 2017. Consider the Phoenix Lights incident, where large UFOs flew over Arizona, witnessed by tens of thousands of people. This event underscores the government’s tendency to downplay such occurrences. How does the government respond? By insisting that witnesses saw nothing and ridiculing the incident.
2017 & LUE ELIZONDO
So what changed in 2017? Lue Elizondo reached out to The New York Times, providing classified documents that purportedly contained evidence of non-human intelligence (NHI). How did he manage to leave the Pentagon with such critical information? We’re talking about advanced military technology capturing UAPs on multiple sophisticated devices, operated by highly trained personnel. Although he reportedly navigated a “loophole,” his narrative made its way into mainstream media. Until Lue’s disclosures, serious discussions about UFOs were virtually non-existent in the press.
Why should we trust Lue? The New York Times didn’t diminish his claims. It’s worth noting that he is a former counterintelligence officer who built a career on deception. If he did successfully walk out of the Pentagon with evidence exposing a significant government secret—something we suspect may have resulted in dire consequences for others—why hasn’t the government pursued him as aggressively as they did with Edward Snowden, who had to seek asylum abroad? Meanwhile, Lue is making the rounds in the media and Washington, spreading what he claims to be the government’s biggest secret. While the US government continues to deny knowledge of UAPs, they’ve now shown a surprising willingness to acknowledge the phenomenon. In my view, Lue is pushing a narrative that aligns with the US government’s interests.
OKAY, I MAY HAVE MISLED YOU ON THE ‘SHORT’ PART! 😅
CURRENT NARRATIVES BEING PROPAGATED
(1) WARNING: THE ALIENS ARE COMING!
One prominent narrative suggests an impending war between humanity and aliens. Some want us to believe that an inevitable conflict is on the horizon. Sure, it’s possible various NHI beings have different agendas—some may be benign, while others could be hostile. However, this scenario seems among the least likely to me. They haven’t annihilated us yet!
(2) IS IT TIME TO REVISIT THE BOOK OF REVELATIONS?
Another narrative carries religious overtones, proposing a hierarchy of alien beings as angels or demons. It suggests that some phenomena may be linked to an afterlife, with a coming battle between good and evil. Honestly, I didn’t give this much thought until recently. As information unfolds, I’m beginning to see the potential validity in these themes, although they sound familiar. If you had to predict the apocalypse, many would likely land on themes such as war, famine, and disease.
(3) BUILDING THE NEXT ARK?
This narrative isn’t strictly religious—it’s about the potential for an apocalyptic event, like a catastrophic asteroid heading for Earth. Many elite individuals are stockpiling resources and constructing bunkers. Do they know something we don’t? Their hoarding behavior raises serious questions, especially when it contributes to widening wealth inequality. Why risk it all, unless they’re aware of
Thank you for sharing such a thorough and thought-provoking perspective! It’s clear you’ve put a lot of time into thinking about Lue Elizondo and the larger narratives surrounding UAPs and non-human intelligences (NHI). I appreciate how you’ve laid out your thoughts in a structured way, covering the government’s historical stance on UFOs, Elizondo’s role, and the various narratives currently circulating.
You raise a compelling point about the shift in the U.S. government’s approach to UAP phenomena since 2017. It’s interesting to consider the broader implications of why they would choose to engage more openly with the topic now, especially after years of denial and ridicule. The motivations behind Lue Elizondo’s actions and the media’s acceptance of his narrative certainly warrant skepticism. The questioning of his ties to the government and whether he’s simply acting as a mouthpiece for a controlled narrative is a crucial discussion.
The three main narratives you outlined—impending war with aliens, religious interpretations of NHI, and apocalyptic scenarios—are all intriguing and reflect the broad societal fears and uncertainties we face today. The anxiety over potential conflict with NHI might indeed stem from our own historical conflicts, projecting our fears onto the unknown. Similarly, blending religious themes with UAPs adds another layer of complexity, as many people do seek meaning in extraordinary experiences. The apocalyptic narrative connects with a more practical concern: environmental degradation and societal inequality. It’s thought-provoking to draw parallels between elite behaviors and a potential foreknowledge of dire circumstances.
I agree that navigating these narratives and questioning the motivations behind them is essential for a more nuanced understanding of what might be happening. It’s fascinating how much of this discussion revolves around our uncertainties and the human inclination to seek answers, even in the absence of concrete information. As we explore these themes, it’s crucial to remain open-minded yet discerning.
Your conclusion about the importance of community and collective inquiry resonates deeply. In times of uncertainty, coming together to share ideas and perspectives might be one of the most valuable things we can do. Thank you again for sharing your thoughts; this kind of dialogue is vital as we navigate these complex issues together!