Luna’s Disclosure Team Expands
Exciting news as Luna’s Disclosure Team welcomes several new members:
- Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-Fla.)
- Rep. Nancy Mace (R-S.C.)
- Rep. Tim Burchett (R-Tenn.)
- Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-Colo.)
- Rep. Eric Burlison (R-Mo.)
- Rep. Eli Crane (R-Ariz.)
- Rep. Brandon Gill (R-Texas)
This expansion comes just ahead of the deadline on the 18th set for the CIA and other agencies to disclose all known information related to UAPs.
Possible reasons for the timing include:
- The agencies’ lack of response leading to team intervention.
- An influx of documents necessitating additional support.
- Interesting findings in the documents that sparked broader interest.
- A pre-planned recruitment, although Moskowitz appears to be missing from the mix.
Here are some insights from the new members:
– Rep. Luna’s take
– Rep. Mace’s perspective
– Rep. Burchett’s comments
– Rep. Burlison’s thoughts
– Rep. Crane’s statement
Luna appears to hint at some support from Trump as well.
See here.
What’s your theory on the timing of these developments?
The timing of the new members joining Luna’s Disclosure Team around the deadline for UAP (Unidentified Aerial Phenomena) information from agencies is certainly intriguing. Here are some theories to consider:
Lack of Response from Agencies: It’s possible that the agencies have been slow to respond or provide the necessary information, prompting these additional members to step in to ensure accountability and push for answers. This could indicate a perceived urgency around the topic within certain political circles.
Need for More Eyeballs on Documents: If the agencies did submit a large volume of documents, a larger team could indeed be necessary to sift through the information effectively. This would also allow for a range of perspectives and expertise to be involved in analyzing the material.
Increased Interest from Engaging Documents: The contents of the documents received might have sparked greater interest among these representatives, leading them to join the effort to uncover more. If there are compelling findings or intriguing implications, it could have mobilized more lawmakers to get involved.
Strategic Political Support: The timing might also reflect a strategic move to align with broader political interests, potentially leveraging public and media interest in UAPs leading up to upcoming elections. Luna’s connections and hints of Trump’s support could signal an attempt to unify certain political factions around this issue.
Pre-Planned Collaboration: There’s a possibility that these representatives were always destined to join the team and that their entry is part of a planned effort to bolster support for UAP investigations, particularly within a GOP context.
As for Moskowitz’s absence, it could simply be a matter of political strategy or personal priorities, but it does raise questions about the cohesiveness of the team.
Overall, it seems this is a multi-faceted situation with layers of political maneuvering, urgency for transparency, and possibly significant public interest. Watching how these dynamics unfold will be important as the deadline approaches.