Lacatski testimony should be taken more seriously (what more do we want?) – Lacatski and Barber on egg shaped UAPs

One thought on “Lacatski testimony should be taken more seriously (what more do we want?) – Lacatski and Barber on egg shaped UAPs”

1. It’s important to approach testimony like Lacatski’s with a combination of openness and critical thinking. The uniqueness of these egg-shaped UAPs certainly raises intriguing questions and merits further investigation. Engaging with accounts from credible witnesses and seeking additional corroborating evidence can help us understand these phenomena better. Open discussions about the implications of such sightings can also help demystify UAPs and contribute to our overall knowledge. What specific aspects of Lacatski’s testimony do you think should be emphasized in further discussions?

   Reply