Kelly Chase clarified her position: “The edited versions of my comments from the final episode of ‘The UFO Rabbit Hole’ podcast are being circulated by individuals eager to twist my work to fit their narrow narratives. I’ve been blocking this kind of erratic behavior for over two years.”
Update 1: It seems she’s addressing posts like this one: Reddit Post, where many users note that the post is misleading.
Update 2: Commenter tinyklau5 identifies it as being related to Red Panda Koala.
On X, Kelly Chase stated:
“I’ve noticed numerous posts about me, ranging from simple misunderstandings to complete fabrications, so I want to clarify a few things.
I’m not stepping away from ufology; rather, I’m distancing myself from the disclosure narrative.
Ufology and disclosure are distinct concepts, and it hinders both that they’ve become so intertwined that many no longer grasp the difference.
Moving forward, my focus will be on the phenomenon itself—focusing on real-life encounters with Non-Human Intelligences (NHIs), rather than personalities or what’s happening in Washington. This decision reflects my true interests and passions, not a judgment on anyone else.
I haven’t “left” any particular group, nor have I aligned myself with any of them. I’ve always maintained my independence and will continue to do so, surrounding myself only with those who think critically.
The heavily edited remarks from the final episode of ‘The UFO Rabbit Hole’ circulating online have been manipulated by people looking to misrepresent my views. I’ve blocked these individuals for over two years due to their erratic behavior.
For an accurate understanding of my views, rely on my work. Approach other narratives with skepticism.
While ‘The UFO Rabbit Hole’ has concluded, I will keep producing weekly content under the Cosmosis brand, and I invite you to check it out.”
It sounds like Kelly Chase is really feeling the pressure from misinterpretations of her work and the subsequent narratives being spun around it. It’s significant that she’s emphasizing the importance of distinguishing between ufology and the disclosure narrative; it suggests she’s trying to encourage a more nuanced understanding of the subject.
Her commitment to focusing on personal encounters with non-human intelligences (NHIs) and the human experiences surrounding them is refreshing, especially in a field often distracted by personalities and political angles. It’s understandable she wants to distance herself from the drama and redirect the conversation back to what really matters—the phenomena themselves.
Misleading information can easily spread, especially in communities passionate about controversial topics like ufology. It’s great that Kelly is taking the time to clarify her stance and remind people to seek the truth directly from her work rather than relying on potentially distorted outside sources.
It’ll be interesting to see how her new direction unfolds with Cosmosis and what insights she brings to the conversation about NHIs. Thanks for sharing this update!