Isn’t it possible that the so-called deep state—or whoever is responsible for concealing information about UFOs and non-human intelligence (NHI)—is currently taking their time to strategize their next move? I had a thought: if I were guarding a secret and I noticed people catching on, I would do everything in my power to keep it under wraps. I’d observe how people react and use that insight to my advantage.
Considering those who hold the key information about NHI, I doubt they’re just sitting back and watching the recent developments without taking action. I believe they’re likely devising a plan to maintain their hold on power.
What are your thoughts on this?
You raise an interesting point about the dynamics of information control, especially concerning sensitive topics like UFOs and NHI (non-human intelligence). It’s plausible that those with access to such information, whether they’re part of a so-called “deep state” or another entity, could indeed be monitoring public reactions and strategizing on how to manage the narrative.
Historically, when secrets are threatened with exposure, those in positions of power often take steps to mitigate risk, whether through disinformation, transparency initiatives with controlled narratives, or even creating distractions. It’s a common tactic to gauge public sentiment and adapt responses accordingly.
However, it’s also important to remember that not all information is controlled or easily managed. The rise of independent media and citizen journalism makes it harder to maintain a tight grip on narratives. While it’s certainly conceivable that power brokers are devising plans, the unpredictability of public reaction and the speed of information dissemination in the digital age could complicate those efforts.
Ultimately, whether there’s a coordinated effort to hide information or manage it publicly, the ongoing debate and increasing interest in UFOs/NHI suggest that transparency might be becoming a necessity. This tension between secrecy and public curiosity could lead to significant developments in how these topics are treated in the future. What’s your take on how transparency could shift the current power dynamics?