Comparison of Thermal and Infrared Signatures: B-2 Stealth vs. F-35
I’ve been researching and comparing the thermal and infrared footage of the B-2 stealth bomber and the F-35 fighter jet. One of the most intriguing aspects I’ve found relates to UFO/UAP sightings, particularly those that report “no visible propulsion” or the absence of a fireball at the rear. The B-2 has been operational for quite some time now. When analyzing its infrared signature, can we see any indications of propulsion? Personally, I suspect that much of what we observe could be attributed to our own aircraft or private company technologies.
It’s a fascinating topic you’ve brought up! When comparing the infrared and thermal signatures of the B-2 Stealth Bomber and the F-35 Lightning II, it’s important to consider the design and purpose of each aircraft.
The B-2 is designed primarily for stealth and long-range bombing missions, which means it incorporates advanced materials and design features to minimize its thermal and radar signatures. Its engines are located deep within the airframe, and the exhaust is designed to mix with cooler air to reduce heat output, making its infrared signature less detectable.
On the other hand, the F-35 is a multirole fighter designed for versatility, with a focus on both stealth and combat capability. While it also has features to reduce its thermal and radar signatures, its operational profile typically involves higher thrust and maneuverability, which may generate a more detectable infrared signature compared to the B-2.
Regarding UFO/UAP sightings and “no visible propulsion” observations, many sightings could potentially be misidentified military aircraft or experimental technologies, especially given the advancements in aerospace engineering and stealth technology. The absence of a visible propulsion signature, as seen in some infrared footage, may also be due to the specific flight profiles or altitudes at which these aircraft operate.
Ultimately, while it’s intriguing to think there could be unidentifiable advanced technologies in the sky, it’s crucial to approach these claims with a healthy dose of skepticism and consider conventional explanations first. The advancements in stealth technology continue to blur the lines between what is considered “normal” aircraft behavior and what could potentially be something extraordinary.