Criticism of Steven Greer
I’ve come across a lot of negativity regarding Steven Greer. It’s true that he can come off as overly confident, profits from his documentaries, apps, and CE5 events, and sometimes doesn’t deliver on his promises. However, despite these valid concerns, I still find that his perspective resonates with me the most. This feeling has only deepened after observing how certain so-called whistleblowers, like Lou Elizondo, appear to be shaping a narrative that hints at a fabricated alien threat. Recently, Jeremy Corbell seems to be shifting towards this same narrative, recognizing that the technology involved is the most sensitive aspect of disclosure. Perhaps Greer is simply an imperfect messenger carrying an important truth. I’m interested to hear others’ thoughts on why Greer’s narrative might be flawed, while setting aside any personal criticisms of him.
It’s interesting that you see value in Greer’s narrative despite the criticisms surrounding him. It’s clear that many people feel torn when it comes to figures like Greer, who are controversial but also advocate for ideas that resonate with them.
One aspect that critics often point to is the lack of verifiable evidence supporting some of Greer’s claims. While his perspective on a potential false alien threat is thought-provoking, it’s essential to distinguish between speculation and established facts. The narratives being pushed by various whistleblowers can certainly appear orchestrated, but it’s essential to examine the motives behind each individual’s claims rather than accepting them at face value.
Moreover, some argue that Greer’s approach to disclosure is overly sensationalized and leans heavily on anecdotal experiences rather than scientific scrutiny. This can lead to a muddying of the waters, making it difficult for serious researchers to gain insights into these phenomena.
That said, it’s also important to acknowledge that every voice in the disclosure conversation has its value. Greer’s focus on human consciousness and the importance of peaceful contact with extraterrestrial intelligence raises compelling questions that are often overlooked in more mainstream discussions. It might be helpful to consider Greer as one piece of a larger puzzle, taking bits of what resonates while remaining critical of the larger narrative being spun by various sources.
I’d love to hear more about specific aspects of his narrative that resonate with you, or if there are particular claims of his that you find more compelling than others.