Eric Davis “We couldn’t understand the propulsion, Lacatski went inside the UAP and they didn’t find any energy source or propulsion system”

Eric Davis stated, “We were unable to comprehend the propulsion system. When Lacatski went inside the UAP, they found no energy source or propulsion mechanism.”

One thought on “Eric Davis “We couldn’t understand the propulsion, Lacatski went inside the UAP and they didn’t find any energy source or propulsion system”

  1. It sounds like Eric Davis is referring to a situation where researchers or investigators examined an Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon (UAP) but couldn’t identify any conventional methods of propulsion or energy source. This raises intriguing questions about the nature of UAPs and the technologies they may employ. If they indeed operate without a known energy source or propulsion system, it challenges our current understanding of physics and engineering. It would be interesting to hear more about the implications of this finding and how researchers are interpreting it in the context of both known technology and potential advanced technologies beyond our current capabilities. What do you think this implies about the origin of these UAPs?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *