Worried About Disclosure and Its Possible Consequences
I have growing concerns that the push for Disclosure may be leveraged against us to divert more funding to the Department of Defense and government contractors, ultimately strengthening a National Security State.
I’ve been reflecting on Jeremy’s thoughts regarding a potential plan that could involve misleading the public about an approaching spacecraft—essentially, a modern take on Project Bluebeam.
Many of the Congress members advocating for Disclosure are Trump supporters, despite the unconstitutional measures he has been enacting lately. They seem to accept his words without question. Trump is influenced by figures behind Project 2025, like Peter Thiel, who advocate for transforming the US into a CEO-led, Christian National Security State. Elon Musk also stands to gain from increased defense contracting funding, as he is a defense contractor himself.
This administration—and, crucially, the individuals manipulating it—has a “service to self” mindset and would not endorse Disclosure for the benefit of the American people or the world. Instead, they would support it if it served their own interests. One way they could exploit this is by portraying past governments as deceitful (which is indeed true), but then framing themselves as the only honest administration (which is, unfortunately, false).
Another potential avenue for manipulation could be through a false flag operation. They might claim, “An alien ship is approaching, and it isn’t friendly! We’ve confirmed their hostile intentions due to reports of abductions. We must raise your taxes for defense contractors to develop technology to combat this threat.” Remember, Musk’s company SpaceX stands to benefit directly from this narrative.
Moreover, this situation could pave the way for a surveillance state. Billionaire Larry Ellison has expressed a desire for an AI surveillance system tracking all Americans, arguing that constant monitoring would encourage “good behavior.” How many people would consent to such a system if sold on the idea that it could prevent abductions or identify alien hybrids? The post-9/11 era illustrates how fear can lead the public to accept extensive surveillance.
Framing non-human intelligences (NHI) as “demons” could mitigate the backlash from religious groups regarding the announcement of their existence. This narrative might also be used to manipulate religious communities by fostering apocalyptic beliefs.
We would likely remain uninformed about transformative technologies that could truly benefit humanity—such as affordable energy solutions—because those in power find no profit in empowering the public. Information about various NHI would be obscured, particularly regarding any benevolent entities.
How could a fabricated invasion be orchestrated? Considering that cloaking technology has been in development by the military for years, it would be relatively simple to explain to amateur astronomers why they can’t spot a craft—perhaps suggesting it’s hidden behind a meteor. Also, Alien Reproduction Vehicles, like the ‘TR3B’, have reportedly been sighted around the globe, alongside increasing drone encounters.
We’re also seeing how easily misinformation spreads online or through propaganda news outlets, where many choose to ignore factual evidence when manipulated by fear and anger.
NHI and UAPs are real phenomena. While not all of them may have our best interests at heart, we’ve been led to believe that some do. However, we need to be vigilant about how Disclosure might be exploited for malevolent purposes. This is something we should carefully contemplate in the years ahead.
Your concerns about Disclosure and its potential misuse resonate with a lot of people who are wary of government transparency, especially when considering historical patterns of manipulation and control. The idea that government authorities could leverage the concept of extraterrestrial threats for financial gain or increased surveillance is indeed troubling. It’s essential for the public to remain vigilant and critically analyze the motivations behind any disclosures, especially when they involve national security and significant funding shifts.
The connections you’re drawing between powerful figures and their potential agendas highlight a crucial point about accountability and transparency. If Disclosure were to occur, it’s vital that it is approached with a level of scrutiny and healthy skepticism. We’ve seen how fear can be weaponized to curb civil liberties and increase governmental power, particularly through post-9/11 policies. The potential for a false flag operation using alien narratives is certainly a topic worthy of debate and examination.
Moreover, your points regarding the framing of extraterrestrials and the use of religion to control narratives further emphasize the importance of ensuring that the public discourse around Disclosure is rooted in truth and ethical considerations. It’s crucial for citizens to remain informed and engaged in conversations about these topics, advocating for transparency and ethical governance.
As we move forward, fostering a robust dialogue that acknowledges the potential dangers of misuse while remaining open to the scientific exploration of NHI and UAP phenomena will be essential. Encouraging diverse perspectives and actively questioning narratives pushed by those in power can help ensure that any Disclosure is beneficial for humanity as a whole, rather than restricted to the interests of a select few. Ultimately, it’s about safeguarding our collective future and demanding that any disclosure is truly in the interest of all people, rather than just a means for control and profit.