CIA Maintains Secret Email Loop with UFO Influencers
Breaking news: VETTED has uncovered a secret email network involving CIA scientists Jack Sarfatti and Ron Pandolfi, who are communicating with numerous individuals in the UFO community. You can watch the details here.
- In the email correspondence, Ron Pandolfi claimed that the famous Tic Tac video was fake and originated from a German documentary that Elizondo had given to Mellon in a Pentagon parking lot.
What raises eyebrows is the rationale behind two CIA scientists reaching out to members of the UFO community. Recall that when Corbell mentioned that a false narrative would emerge about a spaceship approaching Earth, Kelly Chase revealed she witnessed insiders recruiting UFO podcasters with a storyline set in 2027. Read more on Reddit. Check this link. I suspect she’s referring to this email loop.
-
Additionally, during the same VETTED video, James Iandoli pointed out that Ron Pandolfi has been the main handler for Greer at the CIA, with Greer’s data sourced from him since the 90s. Based on James’ insights, Greer has been seen reading emails from Pandolfi on YouTube and accepted his protection back in the 90s after observing threats against others.
-
In a noteworthy statement, CIA’s John Ramirez mentioned the 2027 date, acknowledging that the agency was displeased with him for disclosing this information: Watch here.
-
Pandolfi shared some intriguing claims with Grant Cameron, reminiscent of what Tim Taylor discussed, including an assertion about a portal from which his wife supposedly came.
-
Greer informed Danny Jones that he was responsible for enlightening Admiral Wilson about UFOs during a meeting at Edgar Mitchell’s home. Notably, the Wilson Memo was indeed associated with Mitchell’s residence: Check it out here.
Piecing this together creates a possible CIA narrative: Pandolfi directs Greer to enlighten Wilson, who then investigates Lockheed Martin, ultimately leading to the revelation of a craft with no propulsion or energy source, originally brought to Lockheed by the CIA in the 1950s.
It all comes back to the craft. If Lockheed’s device is a CIA fabrication lacking propulsion—as Eric Davis suggested—we might be in trouble, indicating it’s disinformation. Barber’s involvement is also under scrutiny. Conversely, if the craft is genuine, we might see real disclosures. The challenge is that Ross claimed a top Pentagon official gave him the green light to pursue the egg/Barber narrative.
- Additionally, Lue Elizondo is reportedly building a bunker in Wyoming. When questioned about it, he cited storms as a reason: See for yourself.
From all this, I see two potential theories:
I. The CIA has been orchestrating a long-term psychological operation, akin to a blue beam scenario. Lue is investing serious resources to promote this narrative with his bunker, while CIA operatives manipulate UFO influencers through secret email loops. It’s also concerning that Ratcliff, an avid UFO enthusiast, went completely quiet after becoming CIA director.
II. Alternatively, there may be genuine anomalies involving portals and crafts, with significant revelations anticipated between April 2026 and 2027.
What do you think?
This post covers many intriguing and speculative points regarding the connections between the CIA, UFOs, and various figures in the UFO community. Here’s a breakdown of the key points and some analysis:
CIA Email Loop and the Tic Tac Video: The claim that high-profile CIA scientists are in communication with UFO influencers raises questions about transparency and intention. If the Tic Tac video is indeed labeled as “fake,” this could imply serious manipulation or misdirection in the narrative surrounding government disclosures about UFOs.
Ron Pandolfi and Steven Greer: The suggestion that Pandolfi has been guiding Greer’s data since the ’90s makes one wonder about the extent of government involvement in shaping the narrative around UFOs. If true, it implies a deliberate effort to manage public perception and control the discussion within the UFO community.
2027 Prophecy: The repeated mention of 2027 as a significant year seems to point towards a larger, potentially orchestrated event. Aligning this with alleged insider recruiting efforts adds to a sense of urgency and drama.
Wild Claims and Portals: Pandolfi’s purported mention of portals and Greer’s influence on key figures suggest that there are fringes of the UFO narrative that delve into the bizarre or unprovable. Such claims often blur the lines between speculative fiction and genuine inquiry.
The “Egg” and Its Implications: The idea of an egg craft lacking propulsion could symbolize a larger narrative about disinformation. If it’s shown to be non-functional or a deceptive prop, it may lead to disillusionment among the UFO community.
Lue Elizondo’s Bunker: Building a bunker raises eyebrows. It could be interpreted in various ways—preparatory measures against potential crises, a sign of paranoia, or just a practical investment. The secrecy surrounding it and the context of UFO discussions amplifies intrigue.
Theories:
Theory I suggests a long-running psychological operation where UFO imagery and narratives are manipulated by the CIA. This perspective is plausible considering historical examples of intelligence operations aimed at shaping public perception. However, such a theory requires concrete evidence to substantiate claims of a concerted effort to deceive the public.
Theory II entertains the possibility of genuine phenomena related to portals and upcoming revelations. While this theory may appeal to those who believe in the extraordinary, it veers into speculative territory without solid proof.
Conclusion:
This complex tapestry of claims, speculations, and theories opens the door for robust discussions about the interplay between government agencies and the UFO phenomenon. While some of the points presented may be rooted in valid concerns about misinformation and influence, they also tread a fine line between reality and conspiracy theory. Engaging critically with such topics is essential for any meaningful discourse, particularly when presented with sensational claims. Balancing skepticism with an open mind is key to navigating this fascinating and often confusing landscape.