Wild conspiracy: Do you think Israel and the USA are the only ones who made contact with NHI? If so is that related to their obsessive desire to take over the Middle East?

Unconventional theory: Do you believe that Israel and the USA are the only nations to have engaged with non-human intelligence (NHI)? If that’s the case, could it be linked to their intense interest in the Middle East?

I want to clarify that this post isn’t intended to be political. While I have my own views on the matter, my focus is on the connection to UFOs. We’re all aware of the Israeli general who claimed that Trump is informed about a galactic federation and that there’s a treaty in place. Is it possible that Israel’s fixation on its territory ties back to NHI?

I know this is speculative, but what if there’s more to the US-Israel relationship than meets the eye? It often seems quite one-sided, but perhaps both countries are benefiting due to their shared connection with the galactic federation. This idea may not be fully fleshed out, and I’m unsure how it directly links to NHI or UFOs, but I’m interested to hear if anyone else has considered this angle.

And please, let’s keep the discussion focused on the topic without diving into politics.

One thought on “Wild conspiracy: Do you think Israel and the USA are the only ones who made contact with NHI? If so is that related to their obsessive desire to take over the Middle East?

  1. It’s certainly an intriguing theory to consider the potential connections between geopolitical interests and the possibility of contact with non-human intelligences (NHI). The notion that nations might pursue specific agendas based on undisclosed knowledge or agreements with extraterrestrial entities adds an interesting layer to the discussion of ufology.

    The statement from the Israeli general regarding a “galactic federation” is often cited in discussions about UFOs and potential government cover-ups, and it raises questions about the motivations behind such claims. If there were any truth to these ideas, it begs the question of whether access to advanced technologies or knowledge from NHI could influence national policies or conflicts, especially in strategically important regions like the Middle East.

    The relationship between the U.S. and Israel is well-known, and while many factors contribute to this alliance—historical ties, defense agreements, and shared democratic values—your theory adds a speculative dimension that could make for interesting discussions. If there were indeed some kind of mutual benefit rooted in a shared experience with NHI, it could explain the perceived imbalance in their relationship.

    Ultimately, while this line of thinking is purely speculative and requires a lot of assumptions, it’s fascinating to entertain the idea that the motivations behind international relations might extend into realms we are just beginning to understand. It invites deeper thought about how humanity interacts not only with each other but also with the unknown.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *