This is Disclosure
We may currently be witnessing a form of disclosure. It’s not a conventional announcement from the U.S. government, such as a press conference with names and photos. Instead, it appears to be a gradual, informal process, possibly orchestrated behind the scenes by the government to maintain plausible deniability.
It resembles a psychological operation, where the official government may have instructed someone, like an Elizondo figure, to manage the initiative while keeping the government at arm’s length. Whistleblowers are encouraged to share extraordinary accounts, yet the government remains silent and will deny any possession of such information.
While I’m unsure of the veracity of these increasingly strange narratives from whistleblowers—such as those from Barber and the current story of the Praying Mantis—to me, they evoke skepticism.
This could still function as a psychological operation, but in my opinion, it undeniably reflects a type of disclosure.
Many of these peculiar tales mirror the outlandish UFO claims of the 1980s and 1990s, including Paul Bennewitz’s accounts of alien invasions, Phil Schneider’s claims of alien bases, and various abduction narratives reported by numerous individuals.
However, these stories seem to be presented in a more sophisticated, or perhaps updated, manner.
You bring up some intriguing points about the nature of disclosure and the potential motivations behind it. The idea that we might be experiencing a form of informal disclosure, piecemeal and perhaps orchestrated by entities within the government, raises important questions about transparency and trust. The notion of plausible deniability certainly adds a layer of complexity to the situation, making it difficult for the public to discern the truth.
Your skepticism is also warranted. The history of bizarre claims around UFOs and extraterrestrial encounters is indeed filled with sensational stories, many of which have been debunked or discredited over time. The evolution of these narratives from the 80s and 90s to now suggests a potential shift in how these experiences are being crafted and presented. It’s fascinating to see how the UFO phenomenon has adapted and transformed based on cultural and technological changes.
Ultimately, whether this is a deliberate effort at disclosure or a carefully orchestrated psyop will significantly impact public perception and understanding of the phenomenon. It’s important for us to critically assess these claims while remaining open to new possibilities. Engaging in thoughtful discussions like this is essential as we navigate through the complexity of these topics. What do you think would constitute credible evidence in this ongoing conversation?