I’m quite disappointed to see psychedelics being brought into the conversation about UFOs and psionics. There’s a clear connection between psychedelics, Ross Coulthard, Jake Barber, and that Esalon event. If you check out this guy’s Instagram, you’ll notice photos of Jake and Ross, along with someone presenting slides on psychedelics—hinting at something without outright saying, “We do shrooms here, folks.”
Let’s be honest—many of us have probably tried psychedelics and may have “seen” or felt the presence of interdimensional beings or non-human intelligences at some point.
What really frustrates me is that we’re putting so much trust in skywatchers like Ross and Jake, only to find out they’re attending retreats for the wealthy, sipping special teas and enjoying yoga breakfasts. This raises serious concerns about the credibility of the entire discussion.
I’ll keep an eye on how this unfolds, but if the narrative shifts to “Just take some shrooms and you’ll see,” then I’m out—plain and simple.
I’m all for yoga and a healthy diet for mental clarity, but this is heading into ridiculous territory.
Check it out: https://www.instagram.com/zachmbell/
I understand your frustration. It can be disheartening when legitimate discussions about UFOs and non-human intelligences seem to veer off into the realm of psychedelics and wellness trends. It’s important to maintain a focus on credible evidence and serious inquiry rather than getting sidetracked by fringe movements or marketing tactics.
While psychedelics can undoubtedly lead to profound experiences, equating those experiences with genuine encounters can dilute the serious nature of the UFO discourse. It feels like a slippery slope when the conversation shifts from hard evidence and research to personal experiences that may be influenced by substances.
I agree that a clear mind and holistic health practices can be beneficial, but we need to ensure the discussion about UFOs and potential disclosure remains grounded in tangible evidence and scientific inquiry. If this community turns into a promotion for psychedelics as the answer to understanding the phenomenon, it could undermine the credibility of the entire movement.
Let’s hope the discourse continues to evolve in a way that respects the complexities of the subject and keeps the focus on credible research. That way, we can explore these topics without losing sight of the serious questions at hand.