Be Honest, why do we NOT have an Edward Snowden of UFO info yet?

Let’s Be Honest: Why Haven’t We Seen an Edward Snowden for UFO Disclosure?

TLDR—See the question at the end.

I genuinely want to believe in the existence of UFOs and extraterrestrial life, and while I have my beliefs, I also approach the topic with skepticism. That said, have you ever considered why we haven’t seen a whistleblower equivalent to Edward Snowden or Julian Assange stepping forward with UFO or alien information? This topic rarely gets discussed, and I feel compelled to shout it from the rooftops.

Yes, there are whistleblowers coming forward, but their disclosures often seem limited. I’m not referring to people like Fraver or Graves, who share their firsthand experiences but don’t claim they possess “Top Secret” information. My concern lies with those who have testified in front of Congress, on TV, or podcasts, claiming they have critical knowledge they can’t fully disclose due to needing a Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility (SCIF) for details, or because their safety or that of their loved ones could be at risk. I take these threats seriously, if they are genuine.

Take David Grusch, for instance. Much of what he shared didn’t provide any groundbreaking new info; it mostly echoed what we’ve already heard. When pressed for the crucial details, he had to defer. While I admire his willingness to share what he could, I can’t help but wonder—if he has undeniable proof, why not take the risk for the greater good?

This isn’t solely about Grusch; it’s a broader issue. Why aren’t those who claim to be informed more willing to step into the spotlight and share everything? Or do they truly have the proof they say they do? It raises questions.

Look at Snowden and Assange—they sacrificed everything, even leaving their home countries, simply because they believed the public deserved the truth. That’s the kind of dedication we need for UFO disclosure. Why hasn’t anyone made a similar sacrifice on this front?

You’d think by now, given the increasing interest and attention on UFOs and aliens, someone with incontrovertible proof—a photo, documents, videos, etc.—would be willing to step forward. Instead, those who do often seem to be missing crucial details or have agendas, like promoting a book. Why is that? This is world-altering information—if it’s real, why not share it?

For instance, I recently listened to Danny Jones’ podcast featuring Dr. Steven Greer. The more I hear from him, the more I notice his focus on pushing his website and disclosure materials for sale. When asked for critical details, he consistently evaded the question. It’s frustrating and feels like just another scheme to make a profit.

I do believe in Bob Lazar. He strikes me as credible and has no apparent reason to fabricate his experiences. However, his accounts remain subjective—without irrefutable proof, we can’t fully understand the scope of what he has witnessed.

I’m just tired of sifting through disinformation, distractions, and half-truths. I want to see undeniable evidence that UFOs are real or that aliens have visited us. Does anyone else feel this way?

If you have an example of proof you believe supports the existence of extraterrestrial life, please share a link. I’d love to see it.

TLDR—Here’s my million-dollar question: If you had firsthand knowledge—say you worked for a secret government agency—and held solid proof of extraterrestrial existence, would you come forward even if it meant sacrificing everything? Be honest. I know I would, no hesitation, even with a family to protect. I’d want the truth out in the open, regardless of the consequences. Others have come forward with other secrets, so why hasn’t anyone done the same with UFOs yet?

P.S. Perhaps solid proof does exist, but everything I’ve encountered so far remains open to interpretation.