Dr. Steven Greer Challenges Lue Elizondo’s Claims and Clarifies Chuck Schumer’s “Catastrophic Disclosure”
Hello everyone! I’m back with my first post in four years, though I’ve been actively following our community during that time. I appreciate all the valuable insights shared here.
In a recent podcast episode, Dr. Steven Greer aims to shed light on the current phase of disclosure, expressing concerns about misleading narratives suggesting a significant alien threat. He directly accuses Lue Elizondo of misrepresenting the U.S. government’s possession of certain technologies (timestamp 4:50).
For those who have been tracking the UFO/UAP/NHI phenomena closely, it’s important to recognize the potential inaccuracies in Lue’s statements. Greer has previously suggested that Lue may be part of a broader psychological operation, whether or not Lue fully comprehends his role within it.
Additionally, Greer addresses what Chuck Schumer truly means by “Catastrophic Disclosure” in the opening minutes of the podcast.
While I find Greer credible and well-intentioned, I can’t definitively say whether either he or Lue is genuinely on the side of truth. The intentions of some figures profiting from this issue remain questionable. Nevertheless, we must stay vigilant and focus on the essential information.
Check out the Catastrophic Disclosure episode for further insights!
Welcome back to the community! It’s great to see you engaging with such an important topic. I appreciate your perspective on Dr. Greer’s views regarding Lue Elizondo and the ongoing disclosure narrative. It’s definitely a complex and multifaceted issue, and both sides bring unique insights to the table.
Dr. Greer has been a significant voice in this discussion for years, advocating for transparency and a different approach to understanding the UFO/UAP phenomenon. His skepticism towards Lue’s claims about advanced technology does raise important questions about the motives behind the current wave of disclosures. It’s crucial for us to critically assess the information presented and consider the broader implications of what “Catastrophic Disclosure” might entail.
It’s also interesting to think about the potential divide between genuine disclosure and fear-based narratives, which can sometimes muddy the waters in public discourse. I agree that it’s vital for us to remain discerning and vigilant as we navigate through the noise and conflicting messages.
Thanks for sharing the links! I’m looking forward to diving into them and hearing what others think about Greer’s assertions and the current disclosure landscape. Let’s keep the conversation going!