Ex Military (last post take down after an hour and hundreds of comments on a different forum so I will copy and paste in more forums)

Understanding Unidentified Aerial Phenomena: A Critical Look Beyond Official Narratives

In recent times, discussions surrounding unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP) have garnered significant public interest. This article aims to analyze these occurrences with a focus on logical reasoning, highlighting why some observed objects likely do not originate from military sources.

Debunking the Military Drone Hypothesis

One prevalent theory suggests that these objects are military drones or experimental aircraft. While this idea might seem plausible at first glance, several critical points challenge its validity:

1. Size and Safety Concerns: Many of the observed objects are reportedly as large as cars. Deploying such sizable crafts over densely populated urban areas poses extraordinary safety risks. Historically, military testing is conducted in remote zones or designated testing ranges to mitigate the danger to civilians. Launching large drones over busy cities contradicts standard military safety protocols.

2. Unexpected Airspace Closures: Instances where airports are suddenly closed or flights are rerouted are occasionally linked to unknown aerial phenomena. While some interpret these as planned operations, the abrupt nature of these closures could indicate emergency responses to unidentifiable objects, rather than routine military activity.

3. Global Testing Strategies: The United States and other nations typically restrict military drone testing to controlled environments. Simultaneous worldwide deployments over civilian territories would represent a significant deviation from established military practices, suggesting such objects are unlikely to be traditional military assets.

The Logic of Alternative Theories

Given these points, the notion that these are standard military drones or experimental crafts seems inconsistent with established operational procedures. It would require authorities to abandon nearly a century of safety protocols and operational standards, which is highly improbable.

In the face of such anomalies, the military’s approach often appears to be one of ambiguity—neither confirming nor denying the presence of unusual objects. This policy, whether driven by strategic, security, or political reasons, adds to public skepticism and speculation.

The Role of Misinformation and Detection

It is important to recognize that, in response to these sightings, military and governmental agencies are likely deploying multiple conventional surveillance assets—fixed-wing aircraft, rotary drones, and ground-based sensors—to monitor the skies. These efforts serve to normalize the situation, potentially convincing the public that everything is under control and that any unidentified objects are harmless or explainable.

Furthermore, the tendency of military forces to avoid appearing incompetent encourages them to attribute sightings to known technologies or natural phenomena when possible, thereby avoiding panic or loss of public confidence.

Concluding Thoughts

Currently,