As an engineer, the “Chinese drones” theory is NOT plausible. Here’s why.

Understanding the Myth: Why the “Chinese Drones” Theory Lack Scientific Credibility

In recent discussions and online speculation, a particular theory has gained traction: the idea that advanced Chinese drones and unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP), often depicted as glowing orbs, are evidence of revolutionary, clandestine technology developed by China. As a scientist and engineer, I find this narrative fundamentally flawed and unsupported by scientific principles. Here, I aim to clarify why the “Chinese drones” theory does not hold up under scrutiny.

The Role of Physics and Evidence

One of the most critical issues with this theory involves the physical evidence—or lack thereof. Observations indicate that these anomalous “orange orb” UFOs exhibit no heat signature, a point confirmed by military and police imaging, as well as eyewitness testimony. Typically, any object traveling through the atmosphere at high speeds produces some heat due to air friction or engine exhaust. The absence of heat signatures suggests that these crafts are not conventional technology, nor are they consistent with known aircraft propulsion systems.

Implications for Physics and Technology

If such craft truly operate without emitting heat, this challenges our current understanding of thermodynamics—the branch of physics governing energy, heat, and work. Conventional physics dictates that any fast-moving object in the atmosphere should produce detectable heat. A craft capable of zero heat emission would essentially be harnessing physics beyond our current knowledge—possibly involving infinite energy production or near-perpetual motion, both of which violate established laws of the universe as we comprehend them.

The idea that such highly advanced technology exists secretly and is deployed worldwide without detection or catastrophic consequences is practically impossible within our current scientific framework. If China possessed and demonstrated such capabilities, it would represent a technological leap so profound that it would revolutionize entire industries and scientific disciplines, not to mention raising severe security concerns.

Logistical and Strategic Considerations

The notion that these craft are being openly flown over populated areas—such as New Jersey, Denmark, Germany, the UK, or Australia—strains credulity. Any drone or aerial vehicle of such sophistication would have to be launched from submarines or bases, which are highly detectable with current surveillance technology. Submarines capable of deploying large drones would leave physical, electronic, and acoustic traces long before their payloads reach the surface.

Furthermore, risking such high-profile, advanced technology over civilian populations is highly imprudent. If even a small malfunction occurred, resulting in the loss or capture of such a craft, the technological advantage would be lost