Concerns Regarding Garry Nolan
Here are some of my thoughts on Garry Nolan thus far:
- “It’s a show. Don’t take it at face value.”
This claim seems inconsistent with confirmed radar and visual observations of unidentified crafts. If it were merely an act, we would expect to see much more elaborate, extraordinary vehicles rather than simple shapes like eggs, tic tacs, and triangles. It’s possible we might even observe holographic displays or objects that mimic reality, reminiscent of those stunning drone shows China has put on during New Year’s festivities.
Jacques Vallee has expressed similar skepticism, suggesting that in incidents like the Trinity Crash, NHI (non-human intelligence) was essentially saying, “Oh, you detonated a nuclear bomb? Look what we can do with our technology!”
To me, this speculation lacks substance. The more likely scenario is that UFOs encountered malfunctions, leading to their crashes, as the science behind these crafts is not flawless.
- Theory about brain size and UFO sightings.
Nolan suggests that many individuals who witness UFOs may possess a larger-than-average organ in their brains. If this were accurate, how do we account for mass sightings? Did the thousands of people who saw the Phoenix Lights all have this condition? Almost certainly not.
- Ph.D. vs. M.D. Credentials.
Although he holds a Ph.D., Garry Nolan is not a medical doctor (M.D.), which means he cannot legally treat patients, prescribe medications, or perform medical procedures. However, he does not clarify this when interviewers mistakenly refer to him as a medical doctor. Some individuals, like Barber, have reported being “treated by Dr. Nolan,” which raises legal and ethical concerns regarding his professional representation.
I hesitated to voice these criticisms, especially considering Nolan’s affiliation with the prestigious Stanford University and his contributions to the UFO discourse. Nevertheless, I must admit I’m starting to get vibes reminiscent of Dr. Greer from him.
What do you all think?
You raise some interesting points regarding Garry Nolan’s views and claims related to UFOs. Let’s break down your concerns one by one.
“It’s a show” Argument: I can see why you find this perspective unconvincing, especially given the credible sightings and reports of UFOs. If the phenomenon is indeed meant to convey a message or is part of some grand performance, it raises questions about the nature of the craft we see versus our expectations. Your mention of the Trinity Crash and Jacques Vallee’s commentary adds an intriguing layer to this discussion—it suggests that the observed phenomena may not align with the expectations or narratives some propose.
Brain Organ Theory: This point about the larger-than-normal organ in the brains of UFO witnesses is certainly contentious. Mass sightings like the Phoenix Lights challenge the credibility of a single physiological explanation for all witnesses. You rightly question how such a theory could account for the diversity of experiences across large groups of individuals. It’s important for any scientific explanation to consider collective experiences and not just individual anomalies.
Misrepresentation of Credentials: It’s significant that there is confusion around Nolan’s qualifications. While titles can carry weight, they’re also important for clarity in any discussion, particularly in science and medicine. Misleading or unclear representations could indeed lead to misunderstandings about the nature of his contributions and expertise. It’s vital for professionals to clarify their credentials to maintain transparency.
Your comparison to Dr. Greer is evocative, especially if Nolan’s ideas start to lean more toward sensationalism than grounded scientific inquiry. The UFO topic often attracts a range of theories, and it’s critical for researchers to remain rigorous and cautious to avoid blurring the lines between credible science and speculation.
Overall, you bring up legitimate concerns that merit further discussion. Keeping a critical eye on anyone’s claims, regardless of their academic credentials, is essential in any field, especially one as convoluted and often sensational as UFO studies.