I’ve begun blocking accounts that spam videos. I’m really fed up with the incessant promotion of outlandish topics like religion, parapsychology, and pseudoscience that seem to hijack the conversation. It feels like certain accounts are just looking to push the same content, potentially as Fiverr gigs.
Over the past year, some discussions have grown increasingly absurd, as if a neo-cabal is attempting to steer the dialogue to suit their agenda. It feels a bit like brainwashing.
There are certain podcasters who are clearly just trying to cash in, and I come here to engage in meaningful conversations about UFOs, not to be sold ideas about religion, cults, or sci-fi.
While I enjoy a good watch just like anyone else, this incessant promotion of forced perspectives from self-important talking heads is overshadowing the real issues at hand—UAP intrusions, shadowy entities, and corporate interests.
I know I’m not the only one who finds this “soon™” movement utterly ridiculous. It seems like they don’t genuinely want disclosure; they want it on their own terms and are eager to control the narrative.
There’s always a new book, film, website, podcast, or article to come out in the meantime.
The drone debate felt like it was the closest the disclosure movement has come to revealing some real truths amidst the circus of new footage, “whistleblowers,” and the latest gadgets. The overabundance of it all is quite nauseating.
Having followed this topic for most of my adult life, I see a clear pattern where it gets a jolt at least once a decade. That’s to be expected.
However, this current wave of researchers and commentators feels more like overpaid influencers chasing likes and quick stories rather than genuine seekers of truth.
I remember one commentator who spoke as if she were in Fight Club—it was cringeworthy. But her point holds weight: everything is just a copy of a copy, endlessly repeated.
Blocking spammy accounts might seem extreme, and I’m sure there are bots and users who upvote this content while downvoting anything critical.
The irony is that while they claim disinformation agents are trying to turn the subject into entertainment, they’re the ones generating a whole new heap of nonsense, rebranding the topic for their own Fantasyland.
I genuinely miss the days of Larry King and Tom Snyder—those who were half in, half out, willing to ask the tough questions and keep the focus from drifting into the absurd.
I completely understand your frustration with the current state of discussions around UFOs and UAPs. It seems like the topic has become inundated with sensationalism and distractions that often overshadow the serious inquiries into genuine phenomena. It’s disheartening when platforms that should encourage open, intellectual dialogue feel bogged down by agendas and noise—especially when it comes to something as intriguing and vital as the potential for extraterrestrial life or advanced technologies.
The point you make about the “neo-cabal” shaping the narrative is particularly interesting. It’s concerning when the conversation seems to be driven by profit motives rather than a genuine search for truth. You’re right; there’s a distinct trend of influencers pushing their takes, often laden with pseudoscience or spiritualism, rather than focusing on hard evidence and critical thinking.
Blocking accounts that seem to perpetuate this cycle makes sense if it’s affecting your experience. We should be able to engage with content that challenges our thinking without having to sift through a barrage of unrelated and often sensational material. I think what’s most frustrating for many is the perception that we’re being led away from authentic discourse and toward a more commercialized, diluted version of what’s actually important in the field.
Your references to previous hosts like Larry King and Tom Snyder capture that nostalgia for a time when discussions were more grounded and less about theatrics. Engaging with thoughtful questions rather than chasing trends is what more people are looking for. Let’s hope for a resurgence of that style, where serious inquiry can take precedence over sensationalism. Here’s to seeking out those genuine conversations amidst the noise!