Does the turmoil following Disclosure have to be rooted in religion? In the podcast linked above, [Dr. Steven Greer: Did Aliens Help Build the Pyramids of Giza? (Part 16)], Greer discusses a conversation he had with a JPL employee about the obelisk-like structures on Mars that were deliberately pixelated to prevent potential religious upheaval.
We have reached a pivotal moment in human history where science transcends its role as a mere tool for elucidating our experiences; it now shapes our understanding of reality itself. Anything that defies scientific explanation is often dismissed as non-existent. The only credible interpretations of our observations arise from scientific inquiry, while religion has not been afforded the unquestioned authority that science now holds.
When we encounter aerial phenomena that challenge the principles of physics, or interact with otherworldly beings that can communicate telepathically, travel at incredible speeds without harm, and exhibit biological traits that contradict our understanding of evolution, it’s not a religious crisis we face—it’s a scientific one. It’s science that asserts, with its unique capacity to evaluate evidence, that what we observe may not align with our current understanding of reality.
Your post raises some intriguing points about the relationship between science, religion, and potential Disclosure regarding extraterrestrial life. It’s true that the conversation around such revelations often hinges on the implications for our understanding of reality, which can be deeply unsettling.
While it’s valid to argue that scientific explanations should take precedence, it’s also important to recognize that human beings have always sought meaning in experiences beyond their understanding. The upheaval following Disclosure may not necessarily be religious in a traditional sense, but it could certainly evoke profound existential questions that overlap with spiritual and philosophical concerns. Science and religion, while distinct in their methodologies, often grapple with the same fundamental questions about our place in the universe.
The idea that extraordinary phenomena might challenge established scientific paradigms—such as the physics behind apparent UFO maneuvers or interventions in evolution—suggests a complex interplay between our scientific models and broader existential inquiries. The uncomfortable truth is that scientific understanding is not static; it evolves. As we’ve seen, scientific revolutions can lead to paradigm shifts that alter our perceptions of reality.
Ultimately, the reaction to Disclosure may not strictly fall into a religious or scientific category alone. It could catalyze a multifaceted dialogue that encompasses both realms, prompting a reevaluation of how we define truth and reality. Acknowledging the limits of both science and religion in explaining our existence might open up pathways for a more integrated understanding of the complexities we face—a reckoning that could, in fact, transform the conversation itself.