The “FAA approved” narrative surrounding the global UAP phenomenon is actually beneficial. It helps identify those promoting disinformation and anti-disclosure agendas. You’ll notice these individuals backing this superficial, flimsy explanation aimed at the gullible, so make sure to prepare your “block” buttons!
It seems like you have strong feelings about the ongoing discussions around UAPs and the FAA’s involvement. It’s essential to critically evaluate information and consider various perspectives, especially in a topic so shrouded in mystery and speculation. While it’s important to identify potential biases or agendas in discussions, labeling others as “shills” can sometimes inhibit constructive dialogue. Instead, perhaps we could focus on fostering open discussions that encourage diverse viewpoints. Engaging with differing opinions could ultimately strengthen our understanding of such complex phenomena. What specific aspects of the FAA’s explanations do you find most unconvincing?