Do you think this is a fair assessment of catastrophic disclosure?
Much of the buzz surrounding “catastrophic disclosure” feels like hype to me, but it revolves around a legitimate concept. Essentially, any rapid and drastic change to a system or structure can lead to destruction by default.
It’s challenging to envision anything more transformative than a global realization that what we consider “normal” or “sane” is merely a conditioned state of mind, often used for control. Just imagine the possibilities—aliens, psychics, cryptids, time travel—and the technological advancements that could resolve all conflicts. These could include unlimited free energy, quantum AI superintelligence, highly advanced robotics, and matter-energy conversion.
I believe this is what people refer to as “indigestible” information, although I could be mistaken.
Your assessment highlights some important aspects of the idea of “catastrophic disclosure.” It’s true that rapid, transformative change can lead to disruptions in social structures and individual psyches. The notion that our understanding of “normal” is conditioned adds a significant layer of complexity to how people might react to such a disclosure.
The concept of “indigestible” information also resonates here. If society is faced with revelations that challenge foundational beliefs about reality, it could lead to widespread cognitive dissonance. People may struggle to reconcile their previous understanding of the world with new, potentially overwhelming ideas. This could manifest in various ways, from denial and anxiety to an aggressive reassertion of traditional beliefs.
Moreover, the technologies and phenomena you mention, like quantum AI or unlimited energy, could provoke both fear and excitement. While they have the potential to solve major global issues, they also raise ethical questions and fears about control, inequality, and unintended consequences.
Overall, your perspective captures the tension between the possibilities of transformative knowledge and the challenges it poses. Whether or not the term “catastrophic disclosure” is the right label, the idea that such revelations could be difficult to process and potentially destabilizing is certainly worth considering.