The new episode on the Shawn Ryan Show about the Trump hotel bomber is a ploy to get the public to stop asking questions about the UAPs origination.

Analyzing Recent Claims Surrounding UAP Sightings and the Shawn Ryan Show’s New Episode

In the ever-evolving landscape of unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP) discussions, recent media coverage has sparked considerable debate. A new episode of the Shawn Ryan Show has brought forward claims that warrant a detailed, critical examination, especially regarding their implications for public understanding and government transparency.

Examining the “Manifesto” and Its Alleged Revelations

Central to the episode’s narrative is a purported manifesto attributed to a former special forces soldier involved in a notable incident in Las Vegas, where a cyber truck was reportedly sabotaged. The manifesto describes what the author claims are “drones” observed in New Jersey, which he describes as “Chinese antigravitic propulsion drones.” These claims suggest that these aerial intrusions could be man-made, thereby potentially being targetable by military defenses.

Furthermore, the individual asserts that these drones originate from a submarine in the Atlantic Ocean, raising questions about the operational capacity required to deploy numerous such devices covertly across the United States. Given the advanced radar and surveillance systems operated primarily from bases like Eglin Air Force Base, the likelihood of such unidentified objects remaining undetected at this scale appears improbable.

Possible Intentions Behind the Narrative

Some analysts speculate that the fabrication of such stories might serve a strategic purpose: to divert public attention away from the genuine phenomena of UAPs and to manufacture a plausible explanation for these sightings. By proposing a narrative involving Chinese military technological advances and clandestine submarine operations, critics suggest that this could be an attempt to mislead or confuse the public, thereby reducing scrutiny of actual unexplained aerial activities.

The Whistleblower’s Claims and Their Plausibility

The individual also claims to be “blowing the whistle on U.S. war crimes,” implying efforts to uncover military misconduct and collateral damage issues. While accountability is an essential aspect of military transparency, questioning the motives behind such whistleblowing is crucial. Historical instances show that allegations of misconduct require rigorous investigation; however, the current narrative seems tinged with skepticism, especially considering the logistical challenges posed by the described drone operations and the scale of deployment needed to match reported sightings.

Expert Perspective and Critical Analysis

From a military and veteran standpoint, the claims raise questions about their feasibility. Coordinating numerous drones from a single submarine or other covert means would demand substantial resources and personnel—factors that, given current technological capabilities and military oversight, seem unlikely to be