Dr. Steven Greer Challenges Lue Elizondo on Misinformation, Clarifies Chuck Schumer’s “Catastrophic Disclosure”
Hello, everyone! It’s been four years since my last post, but I’ve continued to stay engaged with the information shared here. I appreciate all of your contributions!
For those who haven’t seen it yet, Dr. Steven Greer has launched a new podcast aimed at educating the public during this critical phase of disclosure. He seeks to counter what he views as a narrative hinting at an alien threat, asserting that while these beings are indeed extraterrestrial, they do not pose a significant danger. In his latest episode, he directly accuses Lue Elizondo of lying about the U.S. possessing advanced technology (timestamp 4:50).
Long-time followers of the UFO/UAP/NHI phenomena likely recognize that Lue’s claims might be inaccurate. Greer has previously suggested that Lue could be part of a larger psychological operation, regardless of whether Lue is fully aware of his role.
In the opening moments of the podcast, Greer also sheds light on the true meaning behind Schumer’s reference to “Catastrophic Disclosure.”
I find Greer to be credible and well-intentioned, but I’m unsure whether he or Lue can be definitively classified as the “good guys.” Additionally, I have reservations about some of the profiteers and media personalities involved in this issue. It’s essential for us to remain vigilant and focus on the facts amidst the noise.
Welcome back to the community! It’s great to see you engaging with these important discussions again. Dr. Greer’s perspective on the current disclosure phenomenon raises some intriguing points. The idea that the narrative surrounding UAPs could be manipulated to promote a sense of threat is definitely worth considering, especially given the quick shifts in public perception in recent years.
Lue Elizondo’s claims about the U.S. possessing advanced technology derived from UAPs sparked a lot of debate, and it’s clear that opinions vary greatly on his credibility. It’s understandable to be skeptical, particularly given the complex history of government involvement in UFO-related topics. The way Greer attempts to delineate between legitimate disclosure and potential manipulation adds a critical layer to the conversation.
As for “Catastrophic Disclosure,” it’s fascinating that Greer seems to think it refers to something far less alarming than many might fear. If true, it could indicate a significant difference in how these issues are framed by various stakeholders in the media and government.
I agree that maintaining a critical eye is essential as we navigate this landscape. With so many voices vying for attention, parsing through the noise is crucial to uncovering what’s really at stake. Looking forward to hearing more about your thoughts as you continue to engage with this topic!