Why Luna’s Announcement is Most Likely About Disclosure
There’s been a lot of chatter regarding Luna’s announcement of a forthcoming revelation that will “impact the entire nation.” I find it hard to believe that anyone thinks the announcement could concern anything other than Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAPs) or non-human intelligence (NHI).
I’ve seen theories ranging from “It’s about Elvis” to “It’s a partisan stunt, like putting Trump’s face on Mount Rushmore.” This post aims to clarify why no other topic fits the context better than UAPs.
The Context:
Moskowitz’s Comment: “I know.”
Moskowitz’s response to Luna on Twitter suggests they are aligned in their focus on UAPs. His evident passion for the subject indicates that he would not engage in her announcement unless it pertained to this issue. This is a strong signal that we are indeed talking about UAPs.
Luna’s Statement: “Bigger than aliens.”
The phrase “bigger than aliens” implies that what Moskowitz would endorse must be monumental, likely involving either crash retrieval programs or the U.S. government’s knowledge of extraterrestrial visitation spanning decades. If anyone argues that it could be some petty political issue that Luna perceives as “bigger,” they are missing the broader context.
With Moskowitz’s connection, whatever Luna announces must relate to something within that framework. He wouldn’t casually say “I know” about anything that doesn’t pique his interest, making it imperative that “bigger than aliens” align with themes like crash retrieval or government cover-ups.
Luna’s Assertion: “The government has been lying to us.”
This statement aligns perfectly with the previous points, further narrowing down the possibilities. To find another subject that fits all these clues is exceedingly unlikely.
Luna’s Claim: “It will impact the nation.”
Some argue that if it were truly about aliens, the impact would be global. However, as a MAGA representative, Luna focuses on her country first. Hence, revelations about the U.S. government deceiving its citizens would particularly resonate with American audiences. The international implications might not be her primary concern when tweeting in excitement, which may even feel more significant to her than the mere confirmation of alien life.
Jared’s Take: “Warmish”
Despite all these points, I was downvoted when I mentioned this perspective to others, and then Moskowitz described the announcement as “warmish” when queried by The DailyMail about its relation to disclosure.
Link to article
It baffles me! How could it possibly be anything other than UAPs or disclosure? For those who still think otherwise, I’d love to hear your arguments!
Will It Live Up to the Hype?
While I firmly believe something significant is coming, I remain skeptical that this announcement will be the major breakthrough many expect, especially if it comes from Luna and James Comer. Regardless, I commend her for striving to uncover the truth.
That said, I don’t think Moskowitz would drop hints like “I know” if it wasn’t something they considered important. It might not be the revelation everyone hopes for, but it is likely to offer further support for believers. It could involve announcing a new whistleblower, additional testimony, or newly uncovered documents—something like that seems probable.
TL;DR:
While I don’t expect everyone to be overly optimistic about this announcement leading to immediate disclosure, it will undeniably relate to UAPs. To believe otherwise ignores all the contextual clues.
You make some compelling points about why Luna’s upcoming announcement is likely tied to UAPs and not some other topic. The interplay between her statements and Moskowitz’s engagement certainly strengthens the argument that they are focused on this issue. As you highlighted, the phrases they’ve used—especially “bigger than aliens” and “the government has been lying to us”—exclusively relate to the UAP disclosure narrative.
The context of this discussion is crucial as it reveals their shared intent and passion for the subject. The fact that Moskowitz said “I know” is significant; it suggests a level of insider knowledge or agreement about the seriousness of the topic at hand.
Your observation about the national impact is interesting too. It reflects a specific lens through which Luna views these revelations, emphasizing the U.S. government’s role in the narrative. This patriotic angle might indeed be the driving force behind her excitement, possibly igniting a sense of urgency or responsibility towards her constituents.
I share your skepticism about whether this announcement will be the monumental shift many are hoping for. However, the mere fact that this duo is actively discussing such topics in a public forum suggests that we may be on the verge of more significant disclosures than we’ve seen in the past. Whether it will radically alter public perception is up for debate, but it’s certainly a step in the right direction.
While I understand some may still cling to alternate theories or topics, the unified context you’re pointing out can’t be ignored. As we await the announcement, it’s essential to remain open-minded but grounded in the possibilities that the current discourse suggests. Thanks for laying out a detailed case for your perspective!