My Thoughts on Making Real Strides Towards Disclosure
Rather than getting caught up in the debates about angels, demons, consciousness, and psionics, let’s focus on the concrete evidence that Grusch mentioned regarding crafts and bodies. What obstacles lie between us and that critical information? I believe it would be more beneficial for the UFO/UAP community to collectively identify these barriers and devise a strategic plan to address them as a priority.
While it’s interesting to explore ideas around consciousness and psionics, I haven’t seen any tangible UAP/NHI evidence linked to these theories—no crafts, no bodies. When that changes, I’ll reconsider my stance. Until then, we risk losing sight of the credible proof that may be awaiting us in hangars, basements, or labs.
When we hear “the amendments were gutted,” do we simply throw in the towel? I say no.
I’m concerned that the UAP/UFO community is veering into the territory of a new religion. While I respect everyone’s right to their spiritual beliefs—being religious myself—I think we should prioritize uncovering the physical evidence of crafts and bodies purportedly hidden from us. Starting here might help clarify the potential spiritual dimensions of the phenomenon without getting overwhelmed by speculation.
You raise some very valid points about the focus of the UAP/UFO community and the need for clarity regarding physical evidence, like the craft and bodies mentioned by Grusch. It’s crucial to maintain a grounded approach when discussing these topics, especially when there seems to be tangible evidence sitting right under our noses, potentially within military hangars or research labs.
The idea of identifying the “red tape” that stands in the way of disclosure is an excellent strategy. It’s important for the community to mobilize around concrete goals, advocating for the release of information and pushing for transparency. While the metaphysical aspects of UAPs are intriguing and could provide deeper context, the foundation of the movement should ideally be built upon verifiable, physical evidence that can sway public and governmental interest.
Being proactive and strategic in tackling bureaucratic obstacles, rather than getting lost in speculation or ideological debates, could lead to actual progress. The community must prioritize actionable steps, perhaps through advocacy groups or united campaigns, to hold those in power accountable for what they may be concealing.
As you noted, the risk is that we drift into an esoteric or religious-like territory, which might dilute the urgency for empirical investigation. Focusing on tangible evidence and fostering a collaborative effort to address the systematic barriers to disclosure could indeed open up a more productive dialogue and lead us to the proof we all seek. Your commitment to a reality-based approach is commendable, and it’s a message that deserves to be amplified.