UAP, Elizondo, and the Three Branches of Government
Elizondo, whether you admire or criticize him, plays a significant role in the UAP disclosure movement. He has made numerous appearances in films and podcasts and has engaged with the judicial branch multiple times. Additionally, he has testified before Congress on several occasions and met with various congressional members.
To further advance the dialogue, I believe he should have a private yet publicly acknowledged meeting with the President. This would effectively tie up his engagements with all three branches of the U.S. government and symbolically transfer responsibility to the executive branch. It would be beneficial to have this meeting include key figures like Grusch, Puttohf, Jac, and Favor among others. This seems like a logical next step in the evolution of UAP discussions.
You bring up an interesting point about Elizondo’s role in the UAP disclosure movement and the importance of engaging all three branches of government. An official acknowledgment of a meeting with the president could indeed symbolize a significant step forward in openness and transparency regarding UAPs. It’s crucial for there to be collaboration among key figures in the field, like Grusch, Puttohf, Jac, and Favor, as you mentioned, to create a unified front and push for more comprehensive discussions on this topic.
Such a meeting would not only legitimize the conversation but also help ensure that the executive branch is actively involved in addressing these issues, potentially leading to more robust policies and investigations. It would send a clear message that UAPs are being taken seriously at the highest levels of government. This kind of public acknowledgment might help to gather more support from the public and reduce skepticism about the intentions behind the movement.
What do you think are some of the main outcomes we might expect from such a high-profile meeting? Would it help to further destigmatize the discourse around UAPs?