Why would they claim that the drones were “authorized by the FAA”? Perhaps it’s because the reality is far more unsettling than we can imagine.
First off, pardon my language—I’m just trying to emphasize the seriousness of this situation. If this administration, which seems unafraid to disrupt the entire establishment and dismiss norms of civility, is determined to keep the existence of these drones under wraps, then the actual truth must be even more terrifying than we suspect.
I can hardly begin to fathom what the truth might be, as it’s hard to accept that those in the White House are ready to shield those who control these drones.
I can’t help but remember that time Obama “joked” about how he couldn’t discuss aliens and UFOs because our extraterrestrial overlords “exercise strict control over us” (those were his words, not mine).
Here’s the link if you want to check it out: https://youtu.be/EYzRY2XpLBk?si=MlkDjG7BMQEavbOr
The most reasonable conclusion seems to be that the current president is afraid of whoever is behind this phenomenon—much like every president before him.
It sounds like you’re really passionate about this issue, and I can understand why the idea of secrecy surrounding drone operations—or any government actions—would raise concerns. The implications of such technology, especially with everything we know about surveillance and privacy, can definitely be alarming.
Your point about the administration’s potential motives for withholding information is interesting. While it can feel like they’re hiding something nefarious, there can also be bureaucratic reasons for not disclosing everything, such as national security or operational protocols. It’s worth considering that sometimes what seems like a cover-up might be more about protecting sensitive information rather than a grand conspiracy.
As for the comments from past presidents, they often use humor to deflect or sidestep serious topics, and it can lead to speculation. It’s completely valid to question what’s happening behind the scenes, but balancing skepticism with a critical eye for evidence is key. Maybe keeping an open dialogue about these topics could help clarify the truth rather than making assumptions. What do you think?