Why do people value Tim Gallaudet’s insights so highly? <\/p>\n
This isn\u2019t intended as a critique of him; I genuinely respect his efforts and am looking to understand more about the topic.<\/p>\n
What makes his claims so compelling to listeners? For instance, he recently suggested that UAP and possible non-human intelligence (NHI) could be hiding in the ocean. That’s an intriguing assertion, but what\u2019s the basis for it? I’ve listened to numerous interviews with him and watched his testimony during the congressional hearing on UAP. To my knowledge, the only insider information he seems to provide includes:<\/p>\n
An old email he received that featured a clip of either the Go Fast or Gimbal video\u2014I’m not sure which. Since those videos are widely available now, I feel equipped to make similar claims about NHIs being concealed in the ocean.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n
A story about acquaintances on a submarine who detected an unidentified object on radar that approached rapidly before vanishing. Unfortunately, there are no additional details or evidence to substantiate this account. <\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
In comparison, Lue Elizondo and Jay Stratton have worked on programs specifically aimed at studying UAP, making their perspectives much more valuable to me (though I wish they would focus solely on UAP rather than digressing into tangents about werewolves and psionics).<\/p>\n
Ryan Graves and Dave Fravor, as former Navy pilots, have direct experience with UAP or connections to individuals who frequently encounter them. I\u2019m very interested in their insights. <\/p>\n
Overall, I\u2019m left wondering what unique contributions Tim Gallaudet brings to the conversation. Aside from being a high-ranking official who advocates for the cause, has he shared new, significant information, or is he merely reiterating existing knowledge? Am I missing something crucial about his role?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"